首个基于真实MCP服务器的评测基准,测试大模型在复杂任务中的实际表现。
MCP-Universe: Benchmarking Large Language Models with Real-World Model Context Protocol Servers
- 通过真实MCP服务器模拟11种工具交互,评估模型在真实场景下的能力。
- 主流模型如GPT-5仅达43.72%成功率,暴露出长时推理与陌生工具使用短板。
- 适合研究智能体、工具调用及真实应用落地的开发者和研究人员。
模型上下文协议(MCP)已成为连接大语言模型与外部数据源及工具的关键标准,被主流AI厂商和开发平台广泛采纳。然而现有评测过于简单,无法反映实际应用中的长周期推理和大规模陌生工具空间等挑战。为此,我们提出MCP-Universe,首个专为真实复杂任务设计的综合性评测基准,通过与6个核心领域共11个真实MCP服务器交互进行评估:位置导航、代码仓库管理、金融分析、3D设计、浏览器自动化与网络搜索。为确保严谨性,我们采用执行式评估器:格式校验器检查代理输出规范性,静态评估器匹配不变内容,动态评估器自动获取实时真值以应对时间敏感任务。对领先大模型的全面评测显示,即使最先进的模型如GPT-5(43.72%)、Grok-4(33.33%)和Claude-4.0-Sonnet(29.44%)也存在明显性能瓶颈。此外,评测带来了显著的长上下文挑战,输入令牌数随交互步数快速上升;同时引入未知工具挑战,因模型常不熟悉具体服务器用法。值得注意的是,企业级代理如Cursor的表现并不优于标准ReAct框架。除评测外,我们开源了可扩展的评估框架并支持可视化界面,便于研究者与实践者无缝集成新代理与MCP服务器,推动快速演进的MCP生态持续创新。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
The Model Context Protocol has emerged as a transformative standard for connecting large language models to external data sources and tools, rapidly gaining adoption across major AI providers and development platforms. However, existing benchmarks are overly simplistic and fail to capture real application challenges such as long-horizon reasoning and large, unfamiliar tool spaces. To address this critical gap, we introduce MCP-Universe, the first comprehensive benchmark specifically designed to evaluate LLMs in realistic and hard tasks through interaction with real-world MCP servers. Our benchmark encompasses 6 core domains spanning 11 different MCP servers: Location Navigation, Repository Management, Financial Analysis, 3D Design, Browser Automation, and Web Searching. To ensure rigorous evaluation, we implement execution-based evaluators, including format evaluators for agent format compliance, static evaluators for time-invariant content matching, and dynamic evaluators that automatically retrieve real-time ground truth for temporally sensitive tasks. Through extensive evaluation of leading LLMs, we find that even SOTA models such as GPT-5 (43.72%), Grok-4 (33.33%) and Claude-4.0-Sonnet (29.44%) exhibit significant performance limitations. In addition, our benchmark poses a significant long-context challenge for LLM agents, as the number of input tokens increases rapidly with the number of interaction steps. Moreover, it introduces an unknown-tools challenge, as LLM agents often lack familiarity with the precise usage of the MCP servers. Notably, enterprise-level agents like Cursor cannot achieve better performance than standard ReAct frameworks. Beyond evaluation, we open-source our extensible evaluation framework with UI support, enabling researchers and practitioners to seamlessly integrate new agents and MCP servers while fostering innovation in the rapidly evolving MCP ecosystem.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。