arXiv:2508.18765cs.LG2025-08被引 19

为分布式AI代理系统提供可扩展的实时合规监管服务

Governance-as-a-Service: A Multi-Agent Framework for AI System Compliance and Policy Enforcement

  • 将治理作为独立运行时服务,通过规则与可信度评分动态干预代理行为
  • 在内容生成和金融决策场景中,有效拦截高风险行为且不降低处理效率
  • 适合需要跨系统协同的AI平台、监管机构及追求安全合规的开发者

随着AI系统演变为具备自主执行、异步推理和多智能体协作的分布式生态,缺乏可扩展、解耦的治理机制构成结构性风险。现有监督机制反应迟缓、脆弱且嵌入智能体架构,难以审计且无法在异构部署间通用。本文提出治理即服务(GaaS):一种模块化、策略驱动的运行时执行层,可在不修改模型内部结构或无需智能体配合的前提下,监管智能体输出。GaaS采用声明式规则与可信度机制,根据合规性及违规严重性加权对智能体打分,支持强制、规范与自适应干预,实现分级管控与动态信任调节。我们使用开源模型(LLaMA3、Qwen3、DeepSeek-R1)在内容生成与金融决策场景中开展三类模拟实验:基础无治理、启用GaaS、对抗性探查。所有动作均被拦截、评估并记录分析。结果表明,GaaS能可靠阻断或引导高风险行为,同时保持吞吐量;可信度评分准确追踪规则遵循情况,可隔离并惩罚不可信组件。将治理定位为类似计算或存储的基础设施层级,为可互操作的智能体生态建立底层对齐。它不教授伦理,而是强制执行伦理。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

As AI systems evolve into distributed ecosystems with autonomous execution, asynchronous reasoning, and multi-agent coordination, the absence of scalable, decoupled governance poses a structural risk. Existing oversight mechanisms are reactive, brittle, and embedded within agent architectures, making them non-auditable and hard to generalize across heterogeneous deployments. We introduce Governance-as-a-Service (GaaS): a modular, policy-driven enforcement layer that regulates agent outputs at runtime without altering model internals or requiring agent cooperation. GaaS employs declarative rules and a Trust Factor mechanism that scores agents based on compliance and severity-weighted violations. It enables coercive, normative, and adaptive interventions, supporting graduated enforcement and dynamic trust modulation. To evaluate GaaS, we conduct three simulation regimes with open-source models (LLaMA3, Qwen3, DeepSeek-R1) across content generation and financial decision-making. In the baseline, agents act without governance; in the second, GaaS enforces policies; in the third, adversarial agents probe robustness. All actions are intercepted, evaluated, and logged for analysis. Results show that GaaS reliably blocks or redirects high-risk behaviors while preserving throughput. Trust scores track rule adherence, isolating and penalizing untrustworthy components in multi-agent systems. By positioning governance as a runtime service akin to compute or storage, GaaS establishes infrastructure-level alignment for interoperable agent ecosystems. It does not teach agents ethics; it enforces them.

多智能体AI治理运行时监管合规

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。