通过模型生长缓解大模型持续学习中的遗忘问题
Mitigating Catastrophic Forgetting in Continual Learning through Model Growth
- 采用模型生长策略,用小模型结构化训练大模型
- 生长模型在阅读理解任务上遗忘更少,保持更高性能
- 适合关注大模型长期知识保留的研究者
持续学习中的灾难性遗忘是重大挑战,尤其对需跨领域保持性能的大语言模型(LLM)而言。本文探索模型生长策略,利用小模型加速并结构化大模型的训练,以缓解遗忘问题。尽管基于堆叠的生长预训练能加速收敛,其对遗忘的影响尚不明确。我们评估了生长模型(Stack LLM)与基线模型(LLM)在领域知识、推理、阅读理解及偏见任务序列中的表现。结果显示,两者均提升领域知识,但推理与阅读理解随时间退化,显示遗忘现象。其中,Stack LLM退化程度更小,尤其在阅读理解任务中表现更稳。在偏见评估中,基线模型随微调趋于中立,而Stack LLM维持60%-61%的偏见比例。表明生长预训练可适度提升知识保留能力,但在社会偏见处理上仍存权衡。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Catastrophic forgetting is a significant challenge in continual learning, in which a model loses prior knowledge when it is fine-tuned on new tasks. This problem is particularly critical for large language models (LLMs) undergoing continual learning, as retaining performance across diverse domains is important for their general utility. In this paper, we explore model growth, a promising strategy that leverages smaller models to expedite and structure the training of larger ones for mitigating the catastrophic forgetting problem. Although growth-based pretraining, particularly via transformer stacking, has shown promise in accelerating convergence, its impact on forgetting remains under-explored. Therefore, we evaluate whether growth-based models can retain previously learned capabilities more effectively across a sequence of fine-tuning tasks involving domain knowledge, reasoning, reading comprehension, and bias. Our findings show that both models -- one trained with growth (Stack LLM) and one without (LLM) -- exhibit improvements in domain knowledge. However, reasoning and reading comprehension degrade over time, indicating signs of catastrophic forgetting. Stack LLM consistently shows less degradation, especially in reading comprehension, suggesting enhanced retention capabilities. Interestingly, in bias evaluation, the baseline LLM becomes progressively more neutral with continued fine-tuning, while Stack LLM maintains a steady bias ratio around 60--61\%. These results indicate that growth-based pretraining may deliver modest improvements in resisting catastrophic forgetting, though trade-offs remain in handling social biases.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。