为不同健康相关者定制仿真结果解释,提升决策可读性。
Towards Personalized Explanations for Health Simulations: A Mixed-Methods Framework for Stakeholder-Centric Summarization
- 结合定性调研与模型调优,识别多方需求并生成个性化摘要。
- 通过可控属性调整,使LLM输出符合临床、政策等不同群体偏好。
- 适用于医疗决策支持系统,助力医患沟通与政策制定。
基于代理的建模等模拟方法在公共卫生决策中具有巨大潜力,可用于疫苗推广、健康饮食与运动行为研究。这类模型能帮助政策制定者评估干预措施后果,并指导个人在复杂环境中做出健康选择。然而,其复杂性使最需受益的受众难以理解。尽管大语言模型可将模拟输出转化为文本,现有方法多采用通用摘要,无法满足临床医生、政策制定者、患者、照护者及健康倡导者等多元群体的信息需求与表达风格差异。这一问题源于对各利益相关方所需解释内容与形式缺乏系统认知。为此,本文提出一种分步式混合方法框架:首先通过调研获取不同健康相关方的解释需求与风格偏好;其次优化大语言模型以生成可调控的个性化输出(如通过可控属性调参);最后借助多维度评估指标持续改进生成质量,实现以利益相关者为中心的精准摘要。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Modeling & Simulation (M&S) approaches such as agent-based models hold significant potential to support decision-making activities in health, with recent examples including the adoption of vaccines, and a vast literature on healthy eating behaviors and physical activity behaviors. These models are potentially usable by different stakeholder groups, as they support policy-makers to estimate the consequences of potential interventions and they can guide individuals in making healthy choices in complex environments. However, this potential may not be fully realized because of the models' complexity, which makes them inaccessible to the stakeholders who could benefit the most. While Large Language Models (LLMs) can translate simulation outputs and the design of models into text, current approaches typically rely on one-size-fits-all summaries that fail to reflect the varied informational needs and stylistic preferences of clinicians, policymakers, patients, caregivers, and health advocates. This limitation stems from a fundamental gap: we lack a systematic understanding of what these stakeholders need from explanations and how to tailor them accordingly. To address this gap, we present a step-by-step framework to identify stakeholder needs and guide LLMs in generating tailored explanations of health simulations. Our procedure uses a mixed-methods design by first eliciting the explanation needs and stylistic preferences of diverse health stakeholders, then optimizing the ability of LLMs to generate tailored outputs (e.g., via controllable attribute tuning), and then evaluating through a comprehensive range of metrics to further improve the tailored generation of summaries.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。