欧盟要求各国建AI监管沙盒,但能力、协调与吸引力成三大挑战。
Operationalising AI Regulatory Sandboxes under the EU AI Act: The Triple Challenge of Capacity, Coordination and Attractiveness to Providers
- 提出统一设计框架以解决各国沙盒差异问题
- 指出沙盒缺乏合规便利性,难吸引创新者参与
- 建议欧委会加强指导,确保规则一致性和可操作性
《欧盟人工智能法案》为在欧盟市场投放或投入使用的人工智能系统提供了法规框架。本文研究了法案中关于成员国建立国家级人工智能监管沙盒的要求,旨在监管环境下测试和验证创新性AI系统,以促进创新并符合监管要求。尽管各成员国已率先推进沙盒建设,但文章指出,各国在能力建设与沙盒设计方面面临重大挑战。若各国民间沙盒采取不同做法,可能破坏对法案的统一解释,导致创新者进行‘沙盒套利’。因此,文章主张欧洲委员会与人工智能理事会应果断制定规则与指南,确保各国沙盒在实践中的协调一致。由于沙盒参与自愿,其吸引力不足亦成问题:创新者担忧保密性、无法放松法律规则,且沙盒不能提供符合法案的推定认证,相较直接应用协调标准与符合性评估程序,优势不明显。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
The EU AI Act provides a rulebook for all AI systems being put on the market or into service in the European Union. This article investigates the requirement under the AI Act that Member States establish national AI regulatory sandboxes for testing and validation of innovative AI systems under regulatory supervision to assist with fostering innovation and complying with regulatory requirements. Against the backdrop of the EU objective that AI regulatory sandboxes would both foster innovation and assist with compliance, considerable challenges are identified for Member States around capacity-building and design of regulatory sandboxes. While Member States are early movers in laying the ground for national AI regulatory sandboxes, the article contends that there is a risk that differing approaches being taken by individual national sandboxes could jeopardise a uniform interpretation of the AI Act and its application in practice. This could motivate innovators to play sandbox arbitrage. The article therefore argues that the European Commission and the AI Board need to act decisively in developing rules and guidance to ensure a cohesive, coordinated approach in national AI regulatory sandboxes. With sandbox participation being voluntary, the possibility that AI regulatory sandboxes may prove unattractive to innovators on their compliance journey is also explored. Confidentiality concerns, the inability to relax legal rules during the sandbox, and the inability of sandboxes to deliver a presumption of conformity with the AI Act are identified as pertinent concerns for innovators contemplating applying to AI regulatory sandboxes as compared with other direct compliance routes provided to them through application of harmonised standards and conformity assessment procedures.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。