梳理机器学习在电力系统保护中的应用,提出标准化建议以提升实用性。
A Scoping Review of Machine Learning Applications in Power System Protection and Disturbance Management
- 基于100+文献构建保护任务的机器学习分类体系
- 实测数据验证不足,模型泛化能力仍待检验
- 适合电网研究者与工程技术人员参考
可再生能源和分布式能源的接入重塑了现代电力系统,对传统保护方案构成挑战。本文依据Scoping Reviews的PRISMA框架,综合分析超过100篇文献,聚焦三个目标:(i) 评估机器学习在保护任务中的研究范围;(ii) 评价模型在多样化运行场景下的性能;(iii) 识别适用于演化电网的方法。尽管多数模型在仿真数据上表现高精度,但其在真实环境下的有效性尚未充分验证。现有研究存在方法学不一致、数据质量参差、评估指标不统一等问题,严重制约结果可比性与结论普适性。为此,本文提出面向机器学习的保护任务分类体系,厘清关键术语歧义,并倡导标准化报告规范。同时,提出全面的数据集文档、方法透明化及一致评估协议指南,旨在提升可复现性与研究实用性。当前仍存在实测验证缺乏、鲁棒性测试不足、部署可行性考虑有限等关键空白。未来研究应优先推动公开基准数据集建设、采用真实场景验证方法、探索先进机器学习架构。这些举措对于推动机器学习保护从理论构想到实际部署至关重要,尤其在日益动态和去中心化的电网环境中。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
The integration of renewable and distributed energy resources reshapes modern power systems, challenging conventional protection schemes. This scoping review synthesizes recent literature on machine learning (ML) applications in power system protection and disturbance management, following the PRISMA for Scoping Reviews framework. Based on over 100 publications, three key objectives are addressed: (i) assessing the scope of ML research in protection tasks; (ii) evaluating ML performance across diverse operational scenarios; and (iii) identifying methods suitable for evolving grid conditions. ML models often demonstrate high accuracy on simulated datasets; however, their performance under real-world conditions remains insufficiently validated. The existing literature is fragmented, with inconsistencies in methodological rigor, dataset quality, and evaluation metrics. This lack of standardization hampers the comparability of results and limits the generalizability of findings. To address these challenges, this review introduces a ML-oriented taxonomy for protection tasks, resolves key terminological inconsistencies, and advocates for standardized reporting practices. It further provides guidelines for comprehensive dataset documentation, methodological transparency, and consistent evaluation protocols, aiming to improve reproducibility and enhance the practical relevance of research outcomes. Critical gaps remain, including the scarcity of real-world validation, insufficient robustness testing, and limited consideration of deployment feasibility. Future research should prioritize public benchmark datasets, realistic validation methods, and advanced ML architectures. These steps are essential to move ML-based protection from theoretical promise to practical deployment in increasingly dynamic and decentralized power systems.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。