arXiv:2509.11184cs.CV2025-09

研究皮肤色调分级对皮肤病图像分类模型性能与公平性的影响。

The Impact of Skin Tone Label Granularity on the Performance and Fairness of AI Based Dermatology Image Classification Models

  • 用不同粒度的FST分组数据训练分类模型,对比性能差异。
  • 粒度越细(如1/2、3/4),模型表现更好;粗略分组降低性能。
  • 建议改用更细致的肤色分类体系以提升AI公平性。

基于人工智能的皮肤病图像分类模型虽表现优异,但易受肤色偏见影响。当前常用的是费茨帕特里克肤色量表(FST),其对浅肤色人群的分类粒度更高,引发公平性质疑。本文通过在不同粒度的FST分组数据上训练模型,研究其对性能与偏差的影响。结果表明:(i) 使用分组数据训练的模型(如分三组:FST 1/2、3/4、5/6)整体表现优于使用均衡数据训练的通用模型;(ii) 将FST粒度从1/2和3/4细化至1/2/3/4会显著降低模型性能。研究强调了在训练中使用合适粒度的肤色分组的重要性,并提示应审慎对待现有量表,推动向更全面反映人类肤色多样性的新标准过渡。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Artificial intelligence (AI) models to automatically classify skin lesions from dermatology images have shown promising performance but also susceptibility to bias by skin tone. The most common way of representing skin tone information is the Fitzpatrick Skin Tone (FST) scale. The FST scale has been criticised for having greater granularity in its skin tone categories for lighter-skinned subjects. This paper conducts an investigation of the impact (on performance and bias) on AI classification models of granularity in the FST scale. By training multiple AI models to classify benign vs. malignant lesions using FST-specific data of differing granularity, we show that: (i) when training models using FST-specific data based on three groups (FST 1/2, 3/4 and 5/6), performance is generally better for models trained on FST-specific data compared to a general model trained on FST-balanced data; (ii) reducing the granularity of FST scale information (from 1/2 and 3/4 to 1/2/3/4) can have a detrimental effect on performance. Our results highlight the importance of the granularity of FST groups when training lesion classification models. Given the question marks over possible human biases in the choice of categories in the FST scale, this paper provides evidence for a move away from the FST scale in fair AI research and a transition to an alternative scale that better represents the diversity of human skin tones.

皮肤病公平性肤色偏见分类模型

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。