AI文本检测无法完美，因检测本身会破坏文本自然性。
Uncertainty in Authorship: Why Perfect AI Detection Is Mathematically Impossible
- 用量子不确定性类比作者身份检测的理论极限。
- 越想精准识别，越可能扭曲文本真实性。
- 适合关注伦理、政策与语言本质的研究者。
随着大语言模型日益先进，区分人类写作与AI生成文本变得愈发困难。本文将量子不确定性与文本作者身份检测的局限性进行概念类比，指出：越自信地判断文本来源，越可能干扰其自然流畅性与真实性，这类似于量子系统中精度与扰动的权衡。我们分析了当前检测方法——如风格分析、水印和神经分类器——面临的根本性限制：提升检测准确率常导致AI输出改变，使其他特征不可靠。本质上，检测行为本身会在文本中引入新的不确定性。当AI文本高度模仿人类写作时，完美检测不仅技术上困难，更在理论上不可能实现。本文回应反驳观点，并探讨对作者身份、伦理与政策的深远影响。最终认为，这一挑战不仅是工具问题，更是语言本质中的深层矛盾。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
As large language models (LLMs) become more advanced, it is increasingly difficult to distinguish between human-written and AI-generated text. This paper draws a conceptual parallel between quantum uncertainty and the limits of authorship detection in natural language. We argue that there is a fundamental trade-off: the more confidently one tries to identify whether a text was written by a human or an AI, the more one risks disrupting the text's natural flow and authenticity. This mirrors the tension between precision and disturbance found in quantum systems. We explore how current detection methods--such as stylometry, watermarking, and neural classifiers--face inherent limitations. Enhancing detection accuracy often leads to changes in the AI's output, making other features less reliable. In effect, the very act of trying to detect AI authorship introduces uncertainty elsewhere in the text. Our analysis shows that when AI-generated text closely mimics human writing, perfect detection becomes not just technologically difficult but theoretically impossible. We address counterarguments and discuss the broader implications for authorship, ethics, and policy. Ultimately, we suggest that the challenge of AI-text detection is not just a matter of better tools--it reflects a deeper, unavoidable tension in the nature of language itself.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品；中文卡片由大模型生成，请以原文为准。