arXiv:2509.14438cs.CLcs.AI2025-09被引 6

模拟验证大模型去偏策略的有效性,为公平性提供实证支持。

Simulating a Bias Mitigation Scenario in Large Language Models

  • 构建仿真框架,测试数据清洗、训练去偏和输出校准三类策略
  • 在受控实验中评估各策略对显性和隐性偏见的缓解效果
  • 适合关注AI公平性与可信性的研究人员和开发者

大型语言模型(LLMs)彻底改变了自然语言处理领域;然而,其对偏见的敏感性构成显著障碍,威胁公平性与可信度。本文系统分析了LLM中的偏见图景,追溯其在各类NLP任务中的根源与表现形式。偏见分为显性和隐性两类,尤其关注其来自数据源、模型架构及上下文部署的影响。研究不仅进行理论剖析,更构建仿真框架,实践评估多种去偏策略。该框架整合数据筛选、训练阶段去偏与后处理输出校准,于受控环境中评估其有效性。结果表明,不同策略在缓解不同类型偏见方面各有优劣。本工作不仅综述现有偏见知识,更通过仿真实现原创性实证验证。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Large Language Models (LLMs) have fundamentally transformed the field of natural language processing; however, their vulnerability to biases presents a notable obstacle that threatens both fairness and trust. This review offers an extensive analysis of the bias landscape in LLMs, tracing its roots and expressions across various NLP tasks. Biases are classified into implicit and explicit types, with particular attention given to their emergence from data sources, architectural designs, and contextual deployments. This study advances beyond theoretical analysis by implementing a simulation framework designed to evaluate bias mitigation strategies in practice. The framework integrates multiple approaches including data curation, debiasing during model training, and post-hoc output calibration and assesses their impact in controlled experimental settings. In summary, this work not only synthesizes existing knowledge on bias in LLMs but also contributes original empirical validation through simulation of mitigation strategies.

大模型偏见缓解仿真评估公平性

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。