通过界面隐喻研究AI写作中作者权与控制感的构建方式
Where Do I 'Add the Egg'?: Exploring Agency and Ownership in AI Creative Co-Writing Systems
- 设计三类不同隐喻的AI写作系统：代理型、工具型、魔法型
- 工具型隐喻让作者更关注操作点，代理型突出创意贡献
- 适合设计AI创作工具时考虑用户对创作权的认知
AI协同写作系统挑战了创作过程中主体性与所有权的传统观念，制约其广泛应用。为应对这一问题，我们研究了AI创作协同中的主体性与所有权认知。基于对商业系统的分析，我们开发了三种功能相同但界面隐喻不同的协同写作系统：代理型、工具型和魔法型。通过对18名专业与非专业写作者的访谈，探讨这些隐喻如何影响用户对控制感与作者身份的感知。研究提出主体性与所有权的分类体系，揭示工具型隐喻改变用户预期的控制点，而代理型隐喻则强调概念性贡献。我们主张，界面隐喻不仅引导用户对控制的期待，也塑造作者身份认知。最后提出设计建议，强调隐喻对用户体验与创作实践的关键影响。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
AI co-writing systems challenge long held ideals about agency and ownership in the creative process, thereby hindering widespread adoption. In order to address this, we investigate conceptions of agency and ownership in AI creative co-writing. Drawing on insights from a review of commercial systems, we developed three co-writing systems with identical functionality but distinct interface metaphors: agentic, tool-like, and magical. Through interviews with professional and non-professional writers (n = 18), we explored how these metaphors influenced participants' sense of control and authorship. Our analysis resulted in a taxonomy of agency and ownership subtypes and underscore how tool-like metaphors shift writers' expected points of control while agentic metaphors foreground conceptual contributions. We argue that interface metaphors not only guide expectations of control but also frame conceptions of authorship. We conclude with recommendations for the design of AI co-writing systems, emphasizing how metaphor shapes user experience and creative practice.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品；中文卡片由大模型生成，请以原文为准。