arXiv:2509.19665cs.CVcs.LG2025-09被引 3

用深度学习提升高分辨率甲烷遥感中云与云影检测精度

Deep Learning for Clouds and Cloud Shadow Segmentation in Methane Satellite and Airborne Imaging Spectroscopy

  • 采用U-Net和SCAN等深度模型替代传统方法
  • 深度模型显著提升边界清晰度与空间结构保持能力
  • 适合甲烷卫星与机载遥感数据处理研究人员

有效识别云和云影是准确反演大气甲烷(CH4)浓度的关键前提,尤其对2024年3月发射的MethaneSAT卫星及其机载配套任务MethaneAIR而言更为重要。MethaneSAT提供约100×400米的空间分辨率,而MethaneAIR可达更细的约25米,使高精度排放源与通量图绘制成为可能。本文使用机器学习方法解决高分辨率传感器下的云与云影检测难题。云和云影会严重干扰甲烷反演并影响排放量化。我们对比了传统的迭代逻辑回归(ILR)和多层感知机(MLP)与先进的深度学习架构——U-Net和光谱通道注意力网络(SCAN)。结果表明,传统方法在空间连贯性和边界定义上表现不佳,而深度学习模型显著提升检测质量:U-Net在保持空间结构方面最优,SCAN则更擅长捕捉精细边界特征。相关数据与代码已公开。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Effective cloud and cloud shadow detection is a critical prerequisite for accurate retrieval of concentrations of atmospheric methane (CH4) or other trace gases in hyperspectral remote sensing. This challenge is especially pertinent for MethaneSAT, a satellite mission launched in March 2024, to fill a significant data gap in terms of resolution, precision and swath between coarse-resolution global mappers and fine-scale point-source imagers of methane, and for its airborne companion mission, MethaneAIR. MethaneSAT delivers hyperspectral data at an intermediate spatial resolution (approx. 100 x 400, m), whereas MethaneAIR provides even finer resolution (approx. 25 m), enabling the development of highly detailed maps of concentrations that enable quantification of both the sources and rates of emissions. In this study, we use machine learning methods to address the cloud and cloud shadow detection problem for sensors with these high spatial resolutions. Cloud and cloud shadows in remote sensing data need to be effectively screened out as they bias methane retrievals in remote sensing imagery and impact the quantification of emissions. We deploy and evaluate conventional techniques-including Iterative Logistic Regression (ILR) and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP)-with advanced deep learning architectures, namely U-Net and a Spectral Channel Attention Network (SCAN) method. Our results show that conventional methods struggle with spatial coherence and boundary definition, affecting the detection of clouds and cloud shadows. Deep learning models substantially improve detection quality: U-Net performs best in preserving spatial structure, while SCAN excels at capturing fine boundary details... Our data and code is publicly available at: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/IKLZOJ

甲烷遥感深度学习云检测遥感影像

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。