提出五级RAG能力框架,解决企业数据问答中的复杂问题
From Search to Reasoning: A Five-Level RAG Capability Framework for Enterprise Data
- 按数据类型和任务难度将RAG分为五级,从基础检索到智能推理
- 多空间检索与动态调度显著提升前四级能力,实测验证有效
- 适合关注企业级AI问答系统架构的工程师与产品经理
检索增强生成(RAG)已成为企业数据问答的标准范式。传统RAG以文本语义搜索和重排序为核心,但在处理非文本数据或超越摘要的任务时表现不足。为此,研究者尝试多种补充方法,弥合RAG实现与企业用户期望之间的差距。由于现代RAG是技术组合而非固定实现,因此需要以问题为导向的理解方式。本文提出一个五级能力框架(L1-L5),根据数据模态和问题复杂度对系统进行分类:L1(非结构化数据表面知识)至L4(反思性与推理知识),以及理想的L5(通用智能)。我们还设计了对应层级的基准测试,并评估了四个前沿平台:LangChain、Azure AI Search、OpenAI和Corvic AI。实验表明,多空间检索与动态编排对实现L1-L4能力至关重要。通过涵盖企业典型场景的多样化数据集进行验证,结果具有代表性。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has emerged as the standard paradigm for answering questions on enterprise data. Traditionally, RAG has centered on text-based semantic search and re-ranking. However, this approach falls short when dealing with questions beyond data summarization or non-text data. This has led to various attempts to supplement RAG to bridge the gap between RAG, the implementation paradigm, and the question answering problem that enterprise users expect it to solve. Given that contemporary RAG is a collection of techniques rather than a defined implementation, discussion of RAG and related question-answering systems benefits from a problem-oriented understanding. We propose a new classification framework (L1-L5) to categorize systems based on data modalities and task complexity of the underlying question answering problems: L1 (Surface Knowledge of Unstructured Data) through L4 (Reflective and Reasoned Knowledge) and the aspirational L5 (General Intelligence). We also introduce benchmarks aligned with these levels and evaluate four state-of-the-art platforms: LangChain, Azure AI Search, OpenAI, and Corvic AI. Our experiments highlight the value of multi-space retrieval and dynamic orchestration for enabling L1-L4 capabilities. We empirically validate our findings using diverse datasets indicative of enterprise use cases.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。