arXiv:2509.22119cs.CLcs.AI2025-09中稿 · ICAIL 2025被引 3

融合分类模型与大模型,提升跨法系法律条文预测准确率

Universal Legal Article Prediction via Tight Collaboration between Supervised Classification Model and LLM

  • 用改进的Top-K损失增强分类模型,精准生成候选法条
  • 通过类三段论推理让大模型优化最终预测结果
  • 在多国数据集上表现优异,适合跨国法律AI应用

法律条文预测(LAP)是法律文本分类中的关键任务,利用自然语言处理技术根据案件事实描述自动推断相关法律条文。作为法律决策的基础步骤,LAP对定罪和量刑具有决定性影响。然而现有方法面临诸多挑战:监督分类模型(SCMs)如CNN和BERT受限于内在局限,难以充分捕捉复杂事实模式;大语言模型(LLMs)虽在生成任务中表现优异,但在以编号为主的法律条文预测场景中效果不佳。此外,不同司法管辖区法律体系差异使多数方法仅适用于特定国家,缺乏通用性。为此,本文提出Uni-LAP——一种通过紧密协作整合SCM与LLM优势的通用框架。具体而言,SCM采用新型Top-K损失函数生成高精度候选条文,而LLM则运用类三段论推理机制进行最终预测修正。在多个司法管辖区的数据集上评估表明,该方法持续优于现有基线,验证了其有效性与泛化能力。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Legal Article Prediction (LAP) is a critical task in legal text classification, leveraging natural language processing (NLP) techniques to automatically predict relevant legal articles based on the fact descriptions of cases. As a foundational step in legal decision-making, LAP plays a pivotal role in determining subsequent judgments, such as charges and penalties. Despite its importance, existing methods face significant challenges in addressing the complexities of LAP. Supervised classification models (SCMs), such as CNN and BERT, struggle to fully capture intricate fact patterns due to their inherent limitations. Conversely, large language models (LLMs), while excelling in generative tasks, perform suboptimally in predictive scenarios due to the abstract and ID-based nature of legal articles. Furthermore, the diversity of legal systems across jurisdictions exacerbates the issue, as most approaches are tailored to specific countries and lack broader applicability. To address these limitations, we propose Uni-LAP, a universal framework for legal article prediction that integrates the strengths of SCMs and LLMs through tight collaboration. Specifically, in Uni-LAP, the SCM is enhanced with a novel Top-K loss function to generate accurate candidate articles, while the LLM employs syllogism-inspired reasoning to refine the final predictions. We evaluated Uni-LAP on datasets from multiple jurisdictions, and empirical results demonstrate that our approach consistently outperforms existing baselines, showcasing its effectiveness and generalizability.

法律AI大模型分类

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。