用因果图约束大模型推理,减少幻觉和逻辑错误。
Toward Causal-Visual Programming: Enhancing Agentic Reasoning in Low-Code Environments
- 通过低代码界面构建模块间的因果关系图(DAG)
- 在分布偏移下保持稳定准确率,优于纯关联模型
- 适合需要可靠推理的自动化系统开发者
大型语言模型代理在低代码环境中执行复杂任务的能力日益增强,但其推理机制依赖概率关联,易产生幻觉和逻辑不一致。本文提出因果-视觉编程(Causal-Visual Programming, CVP),通过在工作流设计中显式引入因果结构来解决这一根本问题。CVP允许用户通过直观的低代码界面为工作流模块定义简单的‘世界模型’,构建有向无环图(DAG)以明确模块间的因果关系。该因果图在代理推理过程中作为关键约束,将决策锚定于用户定义的因果结构,有效减少对虚假相关性的依赖,显著降低逻辑错误与幻觉。为验证效果,我们设计了一个模拟真实世界分布偏移的合成实验:结果显示,因果锚定模型在分布变化下仍保持稳定准确率,而依赖概率关联的基线模型性能大幅下降。本研究的主要贡献包括:为工作流模块形式化定义因果结构;提出并实现基于用户定义因果图的CVP框架;提供实证证据证明该框架能提升代理鲁棒性,减少因果混淆导致的错误。CVP为构建更可解释、可靠且可信的AI代理提供了可行路径。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Large language model (LLM) agents are increasingly capable of orchestrating complex tasks in low-code environments. However, these agents often exhibit hallucinations and logical inconsistencies because their inherent reasoning mechanisms rely on probabilistic associations rather than genuine causal understanding. This paper introduces a new programming paradigm: Causal-Visual Programming (CVP), designed to address this fundamental issue by explicitly introducing causal structures into the workflow design. CVP allows users to define a simple "world model" for workflow modules through an intuitive low-code interface, effectively creating a Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) that explicitly defines the causal relationships between modules. This causal graph acts as a crucial constraint during the agent's reasoning process, anchoring its decisions to a user-defined causal structure and significantly reducing logical errors and hallucinations by preventing reliance on spurious correlations. To validate the effectiveness of CVP, we designed a synthetic experiment that simulates a common real-world problem: a distribution shift between the training and test environments. Our results show that a causally anchored model maintained stable accuracy in the face of this shift, whereas a purely associative baseline model that relied on probabilistic correlations experienced a significant performance drop. The primary contributions of this study are: a formal definition of causal structures for workflow modules; the proposal and implementation of a CVP framework that anchors agent reasoning to a user-defined causal graph; and empirical evidence demonstrating the framework's effectiveness in enhancing agent robustness and reducing errors caused by causal confusion in dynamic environments. CVP offers a viable path toward building more interpretable, reliable, and trustworthy AI agents.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。