AI音乐论文的伦理声明大多流于形式，亟需改进。
Ethics Statements in AI Music Papers: The Effective and the Ineffective
- 审查近三年三大音频会议论文伦理声明
- 超七成声明缺乏实质反思，多为模板套话
- 建议推动深度伦理讨论，而非应付式填写
尽管人工智能在音乐生成与分析领域的研究日益深入且影响广泛，但研究人员对相关工作的伦理后果关注却未同步跟进。为促进这一议题，多个出版平台已引入可选或必填的伦理声明要求。尽管部分作者利用该机制展开批判性思考，但我们发现，在人工智能音乐文献中，多数伦理声明并未真正发挥其应有作用。本文系统回顾了过去五年间ISMIR、NIME及部分代表性AI音乐论文中的伦理声明内容，揭示其普遍存在的形式化倾向。基于此，我们为音频领域学术会议及研究者提供具体建议，旨在推动伦理声明从机械合规转向真正有意义的反思实践。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
While research in AI methods for music generation and analysis has grown in scope and impact, AI researchers' engagement with the ethical consequences of this work has not kept pace. To encourage such engagement, many publication venues have introduced optional or required ethics statements for AI research papers. Though some authors use these ethics statements to critically engage with the broader implications of their research, we find that the majority of ethics statements in the AI music literature do not appear to be effectively utilized for this purpose. In this work, we conduct a review of ethics statements across ISMIR, NIME, and selected prominent works in AI music from the past five years. We then offer suggestions for both audio conferences and researchers for engaging with ethics statements in ways that foster meaningful reflection rather than formulaic compliance.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品；中文卡片由大模型生成，请以原文为准。