arXiv:2509.26308cs.RO2025-09中稿 · ICRA

用传感器数据检测机器人装配中的异常,提升安全性和成功率。

Anomaly detection for generic failure monitoring in robotic assembly, screwing and manipulation

  • 基于力/扭矩等时序数据,用自编码器方法识别异常
  • 在拧螺丝和布线任务中,异常检测准确率超过0.96 AUROC
  • 适用于多种控制策略和任务类型,适合工业场景部署

机器人操作中的分布外状态常导致行为不可预测或任务失败,限制成功率并增加损坏风险。异常检测(AD)可识别数据中偏离预期模式的情况,用于触发安全机制与恢复策略。现有工作多针对特定任务的数据驱动AD,但其在不同控制策略与任务间的迁移能力尚未验证。本文利用力/扭矩等时序数据,直接捕捉机器人-环境交互,适用于抓取、拧螺丝与打磨等工业任务,涵盖多模态信号与多种异常。比较了多种基于自编码器的方法,并评估其在扩散策略、位置控制与阻抗控制下的泛化能力。结果表明,在布线与拧螺丝任务中,异常检测的AUROC超过0.96,能有效识别零件错位、安装受阻等故障;而在打磨任务中仅严重故障被可靠检测,细微异常仍难捕捉。同时验证了方法的数据效率、检测延迟及任务特性对鲁棒性的影响。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Out-of-distribution states in robot manipulation often lead to unpredictable robot behavior or task failure, limiting success rates and increasing risk of damage. Anomaly detection (AD) can identify deviations from expected patterns in data, which can be used to trigger failsafe behaviors and recovery strategies. Prior work has applied data-driven AD on time series data for specific robotic tasks, however the transferability of an AD approach between different robot control strategies and task types has not been shown. Leveraging time series data, such as force/torque signals, allows to directly capture robot-environment interactions, crucial for manipulation and online failure detection. As robotic tasks can have widely signal characteristics and requirements, AD methods which can be applied in the same way to a wide range of tasks is needed, ideally with good data efficiency. We examine three industrial robotic tasks, robotic cabling, screwing, and sanding, each with multi-modal time series data and several anomalies. Several autoencoderbased methods are compared, and we evaluate the generalization across different robotic tasks and control methods (diffusion policy-, position-, and impedance-controlled). This allows us to validate the integration of AD in complex tasks involving tighter tolerances and variation from both the robot and its environment. Additionally, we evaluate data efficiency, detection latency, and task characteristics which support robust detection. The results indicate reliable detection with AUROC exceeding 0.96 in failures in the cabling and screwing task, such as incorrect or misaligned parts and obstructed targets. In the polishing task, only severe failures were reliably detected, while more subtle failure types remained undetected.

异常检测机器人操作工业自动化时序分析

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。