arXiv:2510.02523cs.LG2025-10被引 10

用跨动物映射方法,精准对比神经网络与真实大脑的响应机制。

Model-brain comparison using inter-animal transforms

  • 基于跨个体变换类(IATC)建立双向映射,验证模型能否像真脑一样被转换。
  • 在小鼠和人类数据中发现IATC能区分不同脑区响应,且保持同区一致性。
  • 证明深度模型预测力与机制准确性可兼得,支持拓扑深度网络模拟视觉系统。

人工神经网络模型已成为大脑机制的有力候选。然而,如何比较模型激活与脑响应尚无共识。借鉴神经科学哲学最新成果,本文提出基于跨动物变换类(IATC)的方法——即在动物群体中准确映射神经反应所需最严格的函数集合。利用IATC,可双向映射候选模型响应与脑数据,评估模型是否能以与真实个体间相同的变换方式“伪装”为典型受试者。我们在三种场景中识别出IATC:模拟的神经网络群体、小鼠群体和人类群体。结果表明,IATC能揭示非线性激活函数等精细机制;更重要的是,它在实现高神经活动预测精度的同时,具备强机制辨识特异性,可有效分离不同脑区响应,同时强化同脑区响应的一致性。这说明神经工程中的高预测性与神经科学中的机制准确性之间并无固有权衡。借助IATC引导的变换,我们获得新证据支持拓扑深度神经网络(TDANNs)作为视觉系统的合理模型。IATC为模型-脑比较提供了原则性框架,重新解读了深度学习模型的成功,并优于以往比较方法。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Artificial neural network models have emerged as promising mechanistic models of the brain. However, there is little consensus on the correct method for comparing model activations to brain responses. Drawing on recent work in philosophy of neuroscience, we propose a comparison methodology based on the Inter-Animal Transform Class (IATC) - the strictest set of functions needed to accurately map neural responses between subjects in an animal population. Using the IATC, we can map bidirectionally between a candidate model's responses and brain data, assessing how well the model can masquerade as a typical subject using the same kinds of transforms needed to map across real subjects. We identify the IATC in three settings: a simulated population of neural network models, a population of mouse subjects, and a population of human subjects. We find that the IATC resolves detailed aspects of the neural mechanism, such as the non-linear activation function. Most importantly, we find that the IATC enables accurate predictions of neural activity while also achieving high specificity in mechanism identification, evidenced by its ability to separate response patterns from different brain areas while strongly aligning same-brain-area responses between subjects. In other words, the IATC is a proof-by-existence that there is no inherent tradeoff between the neural engineering goal of high model-brain predictivity and the neuroscientific goal of identifying mechanistically accurate brain models. Using IATC-guided transforms, we obtain new evidence in favor of topographical deep neural networks (TDANNs) as models of the visual system. Overall, the IATC enables principled model-brain comparisons, contextualizing previous findings about the predictive success of deep learning models of the brain, while improving upon previous approaches to model-brain comparison.

模型对比脑机制深度网络跨个体映射

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。