arXiv:2510.02967cs.CLcs.AI2025-10被引 11

用检索增强生成技术让大模型精准回答英国临床指南问题

Grounding Large Language Models in Clinical Evidence: A Retrieval-Augmented Generation System for Querying UK NICE Clinical Guidelines

  • 构建混合嵌入检索架构,从海量指南中快速定位相关段落
  • 检索准确率超99%(前十项),生成答案可信度提升至99.5%
  • 适合医疗AI开发者、临床医生及政策制定者参考应用

本文开发并评估了一种基于检索增强生成(RAG)的系统,用于通过自然语言查询英国国家卫生与临床卓越研究所(NICE)的临床指南。针对指南内容冗长、难在有限时间内使用的问题,该系统可精准响应用户提问。检索模块采用混合嵌入机制,在由300份指南提取的10,195个文本块上进行评估,对7,901个查询实现均倒数排名(MRR)0.814,首次召回率达81%,前十项召回率达99.1%。生成阶段效果更显著:在70组人工标注问答对上,经RAG增强的O4-Mini模型忠实度提升64.7个百分点至99.5%,远超专注医疗的Meditron3-8B模型(仅43%)。七名领域专家临床评估显示,GPT-4.1准确率达98.7%,不安全回复减少67%(从每评者3.0降至1.0)。本研究证实RAG是医疗领域生成式AI可靠且可扩展的方案,能低成本实现指南高效访问。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

This paper presents the development and evaluation of a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) system for querying the United Kingdom's National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) clinical guidelines using Large Language Models (LLMs). The extensive length and volume of these guidelines can impede their utilisation within a time-constrained healthcare system, a challenge this project addresses through the creation of a system capable of providing users with precisely matched information in response to natural language queries. The system's retrieval architecture, composed of a hybrid embedding mechanism, was evaluated against a corpus of 10,195 text chunks derived from three hundred guidelines. It demonstrates high performance, with a Mean Reciprocal Rank (MRR) of 0.814, a Recall of 81% at the first chunk and of 99.1% within the top ten retrieved chunks, when evaluated on 7901 queries. The most significant impact of the RAG system was observed during the generation phase. When evaluated on a manually curated dataset of seventy question-answer pairs, RAG-enhanced models showed substantial gains in performance. Faithfulness, the measure of whether an answer is supported by the source text, was increased by 64.7 percentage points to 99.5% for the RAG-enhanced O4-Mini model and significantly outperformed the medical-focused Meditron3-8B LLM, which scored 43%. Clinical evaluation by seven Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) further validated these findings, with GPT-4.1 achieving 98.7% accuracy while reducing unsafe responses by 67% compared to O4-Mini (from 3.0 to 1.0 per evaluator). This study thus establishes RAG as an effective, reliable, and scalable approach for applying generative AI in healthcare, enabling cost-effective access to medical guidelines.

医疗AIRAG临床指南大模型

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。