arXiv:2510.04757cs.CLq-bio.QM2025-10被引 2

用轻量BERT+ColBERT提升生物医学问答的检索精度。

ModernBERT + ColBERT: Enhancing biomedical RAG through an advanced re-ranking retriever

  • 两阶段检索:先用ModernBERT快速筛选候选,再用ColBERTv2精细重排。
  • 在MIRAGE基准上达到0.4448的准确率,比MedCPT高0.0012。
  • 联合微调是关键,单独使用重排器可能降低效果。

检索增强生成(RAG)通过引入外部知识,使大语言模型的回答更具事实依据,这对医疗等高风险领域至关重要。然而,RAG性能受限于检索模块的表现,通用密集检索器难以处理专业领域的复杂语义,而高精度领域模型往往计算成本过高。本文提出一种两阶段检索架构:先用轻量级ModernBERT双向编码器进行高效初选,再用ColBERTv2晚期交互模型进行细粒度重排。我们在生物医学场景下评估该系统,使用PubMedQA中的10,000个问答-段落对微调检索模块。结果表明,与仅检索相比,加入ColBERT重排后Recall@3提升最多达4.2个百分点。集成至生物医学RAG后,在MIRAGE五项任务上实现0.4448的平均准确率,优于强基线MedCPT(0.4436)。消融实验显示,检索器与重排器的联合微调对性能至关重要,否则重排器可能反而损害效果。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is a powerful technique for enriching Large Language Models (LLMs) with external knowledge, allowing for factually grounded responses, a critical requirement in high-stakes domains such as healthcare. However, the efficacy of RAG systems is fundamentally restricted by the performance of their retrieval module, since irrelevant or semantically misaligned documents directly compromise the accuracy of the final generated response. General-purpose dense retrievers can struggle with the nuanced language of specialised domains, while the high accuracy of in-domain models is often achieved at prohibitive computational costs. In this work, we aim to address this trade-off by developing and evaluating a two-stage retrieval architecture that combines a lightweight ModernBERT bidirectional encoder for efficient initial candidate retrieval with a ColBERTv2 late-interaction model for fine-grained re-ranking. We conduct comprehensive evaluations of our retriever module performance and RAG system performance in the biomedical context, fine-tuning the IR module using 10k question-passage pairs from PubMedQA. Our analysis of the retriever module confirmed the positive impact of the ColBERT re-ranker, which improved Recall@3 by up to 4.2 percentage points compared to its retrieve-only counterpart. When integrated into the biomedical RAG, our IR module leads to a state-of-the-art average accuracy of 0.4448 on the five tasks of the MIRAGE question-answering benchmark, outperforming strong baselines such as MedCPT (0.4436). Our ablation studies reveal that this performance is critically dependent on a joint fine-tuning process that aligns the retriever and re-ranker; otherwise, the re-ranker might degrade the performance.

生物医学检索增强双阶段检索

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。