研究不确定性学习中概率集何时收敛稳定。
When Do Credal Sets Stabilize? Fixed-Point Theorems for Credal Set Updates
- 通过固定点理论分析概率集迭代更新的稳定性条件。
- 揭示在模糊学习中,特定更新机制可使概率集趋于稳定。
- 适用于需要处理不确定性的强化学习与持续学习场景。
许多机器学习算法依赖于不确定性表示的迭代更新,涵盖变分推断、期望最大化、强化学习、持续学习及多智能体学习。面对不精确性与模糊性,概率集(即闭凸的概率分布集合)已成为表达不精确概率信念的流行框架。在该框架下,许多不精确概率机器学习问题可被视为对概率集连续应用更新规则的过程。这自然引出核心问题:该迭代过程是否收敛至稳定的不动点?更一般地,更新机制在何种条件下存在不动点,以及能否实现?本文首次系统分析此问题,并以可信贝叶斯深度学习为例加以说明。研究发现,在学习过程中引入不精确性不仅丰富了不确定性表达,还揭示了促使稳定性出现的结构条件,为模糊环境下迭代学习的动力学提供了新见解。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Many machine learning algorithms rely on iterative updates of uncertainty representations, ranging from variational inference and expectation-maximization, to reinforcement learning, continual learning, and multi-agent learning. In the presence of imprecision and ambiguity, credal sets -- closed, convex sets of probability distributions -- have emerged as a popular framework for representing imprecise probabilistic beliefs. Under such imprecision, many learning problems in imprecise probabilistic machine learning (IPML) may be viewed as processes involving successive applications of update rules on credal sets. This naturally raises the question of whether this iterative process converges to stable fixed points -- or, more generally, under what conditions on the updating mechanism such fixed points exist, and whether they can be attained. We provide the first analysis of this problem, and illustrate our findings using Credal Bayesian Deep Learning as a concrete example. Our work demonstrates that incorporating imprecision into the learning process not only enriches the representation of uncertainty, but also reveals structural conditions under which stability emerges, thereby offering new insights into the dynamics of iterative learning under imprecision.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。