评测大模型代理在旅行规划中兼顾约束与优化的能力
COMPASS: Benchmarking Constrained Optimization in LLM Agents
- 设计多轮对话+工具调用的旅行规划任务,测试约束满足与目标优化
- 主流模型约束满足率70%-90%,但目标优化率仅20%-60%
- 探索不足是核心瓶颈,代码代理展现缓解该差距潜力
人类决策常涉及约束优化。随着大模型代理被用于旅行规划、购物和日程安排等现实任务,其必须具备此类能力。我们提出COMPASS基准,评估大模型代理在真实旅行规划场景下的约束优化表现。成功完成任务需通过多轮对话收集用户信息,并利用工具从数据库获取数据;随后提出既满足硬性约束又最大化用户效用的方案。评估结果显示,尽管模型约束满足率达70%-90%,但效用优化率仅为20%-60%。分析表明,工具使用并非瓶颈,核心问题是搜索空间探索不足,成功率与信息获取量强相关。代码代理展现出缓解该差距的潜力。COMPASS为开发真正模拟人类决策的大模型代理提供了测试平台。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Human decision-making often involves constrained optimization. As LLM agents are deployed to assist with real-world tasks like travel planning, shopping, and scheduling, they must mirror this capability. We introduce COMPASS, a benchmark that evaluates whether LLM agents can perform constrained optimization in realistic travel planning settings. To success in these tasks, agents must engage in multi-turn conversations with user to gather task information as well as use tools to gather information from the database. Then agents must propose a solution that not only satisfies hard constraints but also optimizes user's utility objective. Evaluating state-of-the-art models, we reveal a significant feasible-optimal gap: while models achieve 70-90% feasibility (constraint satisfaction), they reach only 20-60% optimality (utility optimization). Our analysis shows that tool use is not the bottleneck. Instead, the core limitation is insufficient exploration of the search space, with success strongly correlating with information gathered. Coding agents show a promising approach to mitigate this gap. Together, COMPASS provides a testbed for developing LLM agents that can truly mirror human decision-making by both satisfying constraints and optimizing objectives.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。