通过多路径计划聚合提升小模型长链条推理准确性
Enhancing Long Chain-of-Thought Reasoning through Multi-Path Plan Aggregation
- 生成多个推理计划并聚合优化,减少规划错误
- 仅用10%微调数据和5%偏好对,超越基线模型
- 适合小模型在数学、逻辑等复杂任务中使用
推理时扩展能增强语言模型(LM)的思维链(CoT)推理能力,但现有方法通常单次前向传播生成完整推理链,易因误差累积导致思维链偏离。尤其对小模型处理长推理时问题更严重。我们分析长思维链发现其存在规划与执行层级,且多数错误源于规划阶段。为此提出多路径计划聚合(MPPA),在变量间隔调度下生成多个候选计划并聚合为优化后的规划步骤。采用轻量级LoRA模块实现聚合策略,保持效率;同时发现基于结果奖励的强化学习在超4K token长轨迹中效率低,故引入在线步级DPO(Step-DPO),利用扭曲序列蒙特卡洛(TSMC)实现小模型驱动的可扩展步级监督,提升训练效率与稳定性。在多个数学、科学与逻辑推理基准测试中,仅需10% SFT数据和5%偏好对,本方法即优于深度蒸馏基线与结果奖励强化学习基线,适用于多种基础模型。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Inference-time scaling enhances the reasoning ability of a language model (LM) by extending its chain-of-thought (CoT). However, existing approaches typically generate the entire reasoning chain in a single forward pass, which often leads to CoT derailment, i.e., the reasoning trajectory drifting off course due to compounding errors. This problem is particularly severe for smaller LMs with long CoTs due to their limited capacity. To address this, we analyze raw long CoTs and uncover a reasoning hierarchy consisting of planning and execution steps. Our analysis reveals that most reasoning errors stem from incorrect planning. Motivated by this observation, we propose Multi-Path Plan Aggregation (MPPA), a framework that augments single-pass reasoning with plan exploration and aggregation. Following a variable interval schedule based on the token position, MPPA generates multiple candidate plans and aggregates them into a refined planning step. To maintain efficiency, we adopt a minimal design in which the base LM serves as the primary policy, while a lightweight LoRA module implements the plan aggregation policy. We further observe that outcome-reward RL is inefficient for long trajectories (e.g., exceeding 4K tokens). To overcome this, we introduce online Step-DPO, a process-level preference optimization scheme that leverages Twisted Sequential Monte Carlo (TSMC) to provide scalable stepwise supervision using small LMs. This yields more efficient training, improved stability, and higher accuracy. Extensive experiments on challenging math, science, and logical reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that, with only 10% SFT data and 5% of preference pairs, our method outperforms both the DeepSeek-R1 distillation baseline and the outcome-reward RL baseline across multiple base models and tasks.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。