揭示神经符号模型中的推理捷径问题,助你理解如何让AI更可信。
Symbol Grounding in Neuro-Symbolic AI: A Gentle Introduction to Reasoning Shortcuts
- 通过结合神经网络与符号推理,提升AI可解释性
- 发现概念未受监督时,模型可能错误锚定语义却仍高准确率
- 提供检测和缓解推理捷路的实用策略,适合安全敏感场景
神经符号(NeSy)AI旨在构建符合先验知识(如安全或结构约束)的深度神经网络,是实现可靠可信AI的重要方向。其核心思想是将神经网络与符号推理结合:神经网络负责将低层输入映射为高层符号概念,符号推理则基于提取的概念与先验知识推导预测。然而,近期研究发现,当概念未被直接监督时,NeSy模型可能产生推理捷径(RS),即在概念错误锚定的情况下仍获得高标签准确率。这会损害模型解释的可理解性、分布外泛化性能,进而影响可靠性。而由于缺乏概念监督,这类问题难以检测和防范。现有文献对推理捷径的讨论分散,不利于研究者掌握。本文以通俗方式介绍其成因与后果,梳理理论分析,并系统总结缓解与意识提升策略,明确各方法的优势与局限。通过将复杂内容简化呈现,本综述旨在为应对推理捷径提供统一视角,降低研究门槛,推动可靠神经符号与可信AI的发展。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Neuro-symbolic (NeSy) AI aims to develop deep neural networks whose predictions comply with prior knowledge encoding, e.g. safety or structural constraints. As such, it represents one of the most promising avenues for reliable and trustworthy AI. The core idea behind NeSy AI is to combine neural and symbolic steps: neural networks are typically responsible for mapping low-level inputs into high-level symbolic concepts, while symbolic reasoning infers predictions compatible with the extracted concepts and the prior knowledge. Despite their promise, it was recently shown that - whenever the concepts are not supervised directly - NeSy models can be affected by Reasoning Shortcuts (RSs). That is, they can achieve high label accuracy by grounding the concepts incorrectly. RSs can compromise the interpretability of the model's explanations, performance in out-of-distribution scenarios, and therefore reliability. At the same time, RSs are difficult to detect and prevent unless concept supervision is available, which is typically not the case. However, the literature on RSs is scattered, making it difficult for researchers and practitioners to understand and tackle this challenging problem. This overview addresses this issue by providing a gentle introduction to RSs, discussing their causes and consequences in intuitive terms. It also reviews and elucidates existing theoretical characterizations of this phenomenon. Finally, it details methods for dealing with RSs, including mitigation and awareness strategies, and maps their benefits and limitations. By reformulating advanced material in a digestible form, this overview aims to provide a unifying perspective on RSs to lower the bar to entry for tackling them. Ultimately, we hope this overview contributes to the development of reliable NeSy and trustworthy AI models.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。