ChatGPT虽有知识却无法整合推理，法律文本理解仍显短板
ChatGPT Unveils Its Limits: Principles of Law Deliver Checkmate
- 用正则表达式对比，检验ChatGPT在法律文本中的推理能力
- 即使掌握必要知识，也无法整合形成完整结论
- 适合关注AI局限性的法律科技研究者参考
本研究通过实验评估了ChatGPT在法律领域的表现，将其与基于正则表达式（Regex）的基线方法进行对比，而非仅与人类表现比较。结果表明，尽管ChatGPT具备所需知识和能力，但无法有效分解复杂问题并整合多方面能力进行推理，无法得出全面结果。这揭示了其在法律领域中的核心缺陷：缺乏对法律原则（PoLs）的全局性理解与推理能力。在法律实践中，准确提取判例中的关键法律原则并用于后续判决或辩护文件，是关键任务。当前人工智能尚不具备这种综合性智能，真正意义上的系统性推理仍是人类独有的特质。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
This study examines the performance of ChatGPT with an experiment in the legal domain. We compare the outcome with it a baseline using regular expressions (Regex), rather than focusing solely on the assessment against human performance. The study reveals that even if ChatGPT has access to the necessary knowledge and competencies, it is unable to assemble them, reason through, in a way that leads to an exhaustive result. This unveils a major limitation of ChatGPT. Intelligence encompasses the ability to break down complex issues and address them according to multiple required competencies, providing a unified and comprehensive solution. In the legal domain, one of the most crucial tasks is reading legal decisions and extracting key passages condensed from principles of law (PoLs), which are then incorporated into subsequent rulings by judges or defense documents by lawyers. In performing this task, artificial intelligence lacks an all-encompassing understanding and reasoning, which makes it inherently limited. Genuine intelligence, remains a uniquely human trait, at least in this particular field.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品；中文卡片由大模型生成，请以原文为准。