记者用'可控变革'应对AI冲击,守护专业权威
On Controlled Change: Generative AI's Impact on Professional Authority in Journalism
- 提出'可控变革'框架,引导记者主动制定AI使用规范
- 通过13位从业者访谈,发现三类管理机制
- 适合关注媒体转型与人机协作的研究者
自2022年OpenAI的ChatGPT发布以来,大型语言模型在新闻业中的应用引发广泛关注。本文基于对荷兰多家媒体机构中13名编辑、记者及创新管理者的一对一访谈,探讨记者如何将AI技术融入日常工作。研究提出'可控变革'这一概念,用以解释记者在实践中如何主动制定使用指南、实验工具适用性,并识别其能力边界。以专业权威为理论框架,论文指出记者以监督方式整合AI技术,形成三大机制:(1)制定符合伦理规范的适应性准则;(2)通过实操测试评估工具必要性与契合度;(3)批判性审视AI系统的性能与局限。研究揭示了记者在技术变革中维护职业主导权的能动性。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Using (generative) artificial intelligence tools and systems in journalism is expected to increase journalists' production rates, transform newsrooms' economic models, and further personalize the audience's news consumption practices. Since its release in 2022, OpenAI's ChatGPT and other large language models have raised the alarms inside news organizations, not only for bringing new challenges to news reporting and fact-checking but also for what these technologies would mean for journalists' professional authority in journalism. This paper examines how journalists in Dutch media manage the integration of AI technologies into their daily routines. Drawing from 13 interviews with editors, journalists, and innovation managers in different news outlets and media companies, we propose the concept of controlled change. as a heuristic to explain how journalists are proactively setting guidelines, experimenting with AI tools, and identifying their limitations and capabilities. Using professional authority as a theoretical framework, we argue that journalists anticipate and integrate AI technologies in a supervised manner and identify three primary mechanisms through which journalists manage this integration: (1) developing adaptive guidelines that align AI use with ethical codes, (2) experimenting with AI technologies to determine their necessity and fit, and (3) critically assessing the capabilities and limitations of AI systems.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。