arXiv:2510.21091stat.MLcs.LG2025-10被引 1

提出新算法缓解多敏感属性下的公平性计算难题

Doubly-Regressing Approach for Subgroup Fairness

  • 通过关注大样本子群和边缘公平性降低计算负担
  • 新指标supIPM能有效衡量子群公平性,实验显示性能更优
  • 适合处理多敏感属性场景,尤其当子群过小时

算法公平性是人工智能实际应用中的关键社会议题。当存在多个敏感属性(如性别、种族、年龄)时,子群公平性广受关注。然而,随着敏感属性数量增加,子群数量激增,导致计算负担重和数据稀疏问题(子群样本过少)。本文提出一种新型学习算法,通过聚焦足够大样本的子群及边缘公平性,解决上述问题。我们定义了子群-子集公平性概念,并引入分布公平性度量——上确界积分概率度量(supIPM)。基于此,提出双回归对抗学习框架DRAF,以代理公平差距替代直接最小化supIPM,显著减少计算开销。理论上证明该代理公平差距是supIPM的上界。实验表明,该算法在基准数据集上优于基线方法,尤其在敏感属性较多、子群规模很小时表现更佳。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Algorithmic fairness is a socially crucial topic in real-world applications of AI. Among many notions of fairness, subgroup fairness is widely studied when multiple sensitive attributes (e.g., gender, race, age) are present. However, as the number of sensitive attributes grows, the number of subgroups increases accordingly, creating heavy computational burdens and data sparsity problem (subgroups with too small sizes). In this paper, we develop a novel learning algorithm for subgroup fairness which resolves these issues by focusing on subgroups with sufficient sample sizes as well as marginal fairness (fairness for each sensitive attribute). To this end, we formalize a notion of subgroup-subset fairness and introduce a corresponding distributional fairness measure called the supremum Integral Probability Metric (supIPM). Building on this formulation, we propose the Doubly Regressing Adversarial learning for subgroup Fairness (DRAF) algorithm, which reduces a surrogate fairness gap for supIPM with much less computation than directly reducing supIPM. Theoretically, we prove that the proposed surrogate fairness gap is an upper bound of supIPM. Empirically, we show that the DRAF algorithm outperforms baseline methods in benchmark datasets, specifically when the number of sensitive attributes is large so that many subgroups are very small.

公平性子群对抗学习

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。