arXiv:2510.21293cs.AIcs.HC2025-10综述被引 7

剖析AI可信度研究的盲区,揭示技术之外的社会维度重要性

Understanding AI Trustworthiness: A Scoping Review of AIES & FAccT Articles

  • 从会议论文出发,系统梳理可信AI的定义与评估方式
  • 发现现有研究过度关注技术指标,忽视社会伦理影响
  • 呼吁跨学科融合,推动更全面的AI伦理框架建设

可信AI是AIES与FAccT两大人工智能伦理会议的核心议题。然而,当前研究多聚焦于可靠性、鲁棒性和公平性等技术属性,忽略了真实场景中社会技术维度对可信度的关键作用。本综述系统分析了迄今所有AIES与FAccT会议论文,探究可信度在不同研究领域中的概念化、操作化与应用方式,涵盖概念建构、测量方法、验证技术、应用场景及底层价值。结果显示,尽管透明性、问责制和鲁棒性等技术属性已获广泛定义,但研究仍以技术精度为导向,社会与伦理层面探讨不足。可信度本身成为由权力主体定义的争议性概念。结论指出,必须结合技术严谨性与社会文化制度考量,才能实现真正意义上的可信AI。建议学术界采纳综合性框架,切实回应技术与社会之间的复杂互动,推动负责任的技术发展。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Background: Trustworthy AI serves as a foundational pillar for two major AI ethics conferences: AIES and FAccT. However, current research often adopts techno-centric approaches, focusing primarily on technical attributes such as reliability, robustness, and fairness, while overlooking the sociotechnical dimensions critical to understanding AI trustworthiness in real-world contexts. Objectives: This scoping review aims to examine how the AIES and FAccT communities conceptualize, measure, and validate AI trustworthiness, identifying major gaps and opportunities for advancing a holistic understanding of trustworthy AI systems. Methods: We conduct a scoping review of AIES and FAccT conference proceedings to date, systematically analyzing how trustworthiness is defined, operationalized, and applied across different research domains. Our analysis focuses on conceptualization approaches, measurement methods, verification and validation techniques, application areas, and underlying values. Results: While significant progress has been made in defining technical attributes such as transparency, accountability, and robustness, our findings reveal critical gaps. Current research often predominantly emphasizes technical precision at the expense of social and ethical considerations. The sociotechnical nature of AI systems remains less explored and trustworthiness emerges as a contested concept shaped by those with the power to define it. Conclusions: An interdisciplinary approach combining technical rigor with social, cultural, and institutional considerations is essential for advancing trustworthy AI. We propose actionable measures for the AI ethics community to adopt holistic frameworks that genuinely address the complex interplay between AI systems and society, ultimately promoting responsible technological development that benefits all stakeholders.

AI伦理可信AI社会技术

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。