arXiv:2510.22063stat.MLcs.AI2025-10被引 2

用频率学派视角解释深度集成为何能有效捕捉模型不确定性。

Deep Ensembles for Epistemic Uncertainty: A Frequentist Perspective

  • 提出基于自助法的不确定性估计器,证明其渐近正确。
  • 发现深度集成主要捕获训练随机性,占多数模型不确定性。
  • 为深度集成在实际中的成功提供理论解释,适合可信AI研究者。

将预测不确定性分解为不可约的随机性(aleatoric)和可减少的模型不确定性(epistemic),对机器学习系统的可靠部署至关重要。尽管互信息是衡量模型不确定性的理论依据,但需访问参数后验,计算成本高。因此,实践中常依赖深度集成的概率输出来量化不确定性,表现出良好经验性能。然而,从频率学派视角理解其有效性仍不充分。本文首先提出一种基于自助法的模型不确定性估计器,并证明其渐近正确;随后通过分解为数据变异性和训练随机性,揭示深度集成主要捕捉训练随机性成分。实证研究表明,该随机性成分构成大部分模型不确定性,从而解释了深度集成的有效性。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Decomposing prediction uncertainty into aleatoric (irreducible) and epistemic (reducible) components is critical for the reliable deployment of machine learning systems. While the mutual information between the response variable and model parameters is a principled measure for epistemic uncertainty, it requires access to the parameter posterior, which is computationally challenging to approximate. Consequently, practitioners often rely on probabilistic predictions from deep ensembles to quantify uncertainty, which have demonstrated strong empirical performance. However, a theoretical understanding of their success from a frequentist perspective remains limited. We address this gap by first considering a bootstrap-based estimator for epistemic uncertainty, which we prove is asymptotically correct. Next, we connect deep ensembles to the bootstrap estimator by decomposing it into data variability and training stochasticity; specifically, we show that deep ensembles capture the training stochasticity component. Through empirical studies, we show that this stochasticity component constitutes the majority of epistemic uncertainty, thereby explaining the effectiveness of deep ensembles.

不确定性建模深度集成频率学派可信AI

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。