arXiv:2510.25386cs.ROcs.AI2025-10中稿 · 2025 IEEE Internat…综述

让自动驾驶更合规:融合法律与逻辑规范的系统性综述

Integrating Legal and Logical Specifications in Perception, Prediction, and Planning for Automated Driving: A Survey of Methods

  • 用逻辑框架与法律推理整合感知、预测与规划模块
  • 强调在不确定环境中实现合规性与决策可解释性的统一
  • 适合关注自动驾驶合规与可解释性的研究者与工程师

本综述系统分析了将法律与逻辑规范融入自动驾驶系统感知、预测和规划模块的当前方法。从基于逻辑的框架到计算法律推理,重点评估其在动态不确定交通环境中的合规性保障与可解释性能力。核心发现表明,感知可靠性、法律合规性与决策正当性三者交汇处存在显著挑战。为此,提出一种分类体系,按理论基础、架构实现与验证策略对现有方法进行归类。特别关注处理感知不确定性并显式嵌入法律规范的方法,以支持技术稳健且法律可辩护的决策。涵盖神经符号融合感知、逻辑驱动规则表示及规范感知预测策略,共同推动透明可问责的自动驾驶运行。最后指出关键开放问题与实际权衡,结合工程、逻辑与法学视角,为未来合规自动驾驶发展提供多学科指导。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

This survey provides an analysis of current methodologies integrating legal and logical specifications into the perception, prediction, and planning modules of automated driving systems. We systematically explore techniques ranging from logic-based frameworks to computational legal reasoning approaches, emphasizing their capability to ensure regulatory compliance and interpretability in dynamic and uncertain driving environments. A central finding is that significant challenges arise at the intersection of perceptual reliability, legal compliance, and decision-making justifiability. To systematically analyze these challenges, we introduce a taxonomy categorizing existing approaches by their theoretical foundations, architectural implementations, and validation strategies. We particularly focus on methods that address perceptual uncertainty and incorporate explicit legal norms, facilitating decisions that are both technically robust and legally defensible. The review covers neural-symbolic integration methods for perception, logic-driven rule representation, and norm-aware prediction strategies, all contributing toward transparent and accountable autonomous vehicle operation. We highlight critical open questions and practical trade-offs that must be addressed, offering multidisciplinary insights from engineering, logic, and law to guide future developments in legally compliant autonomous driving systems.

自动驾驶法律合规可解释性逻辑推理

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。