首个多光谱激光雷达树冠分割数据集,助力森林精细监测
Benchmarking individual tree segmentation using multispectral airborne laser scanning data: the FGI-EMIT dataset
- 构建首个大规模多光谱激光雷达树冠分割基准数据集
- 深度学习模型在小树苗分割上比传统方法高25.9个百分点
- 尽管多光谱信息未被充分使用,但单通道反射率仍可提升精度
从激光雷达点云中进行个体树木分割(ITS)是森林资源调查、碳储量监测和生物多样性评估的基础。传统方法依赖无监督几何算法,近年则转向有监督深度学习(DL)。过去方法发展受限于缺乏大规模基准数据集,尤其是多光谱(MS)激光雷达数据稀缺,尽管已有证据表明多光谱反射率能提升分割精度。本研究提出FGI-EMIT,首个用于个体树木分割的大规模多光谱机载激光雷达基准数据集,涵盖532、905和1550纳米波长数据,包含1561棵人工标注的树木,特别关注小型林下树木。基于该数据集,我们系统评测了四种无监督算法和四种有监督深度学习方法。无监督方法经贝叶斯优化超参数,深度学习模型从头训练。其中,Treeiso取得最高测试集F1分数52.7%;深度学习整体表现显著更优,最佳模型ForestFormer3D达到73.3%的F1分数。在林下树木上,两者差距达25.9个百分点。消融实验显示,现有深度学习方法普遍未能有效利用多光谱反射率作为输入特征,尽管单通道反射率可小幅提升精度,尤其对林下树种。不同点密度下的性能分析表明,即使在每平方米仅10个点的低密度下,深度学习方法仍持续优于无监督算法。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Individual tree segmentation (ITS) from LiDAR point clouds is fundamental for applications such as forest inventory, carbon monitoring and biodiversity assessment. Traditionally, ITS has been achieved with unsupervised geometry-based algorithms, while more recent advances have shifted toward supervised deep learning (DL). In the past, progress in method development was hindered by the lack of large-scale benchmark datasets, and the availability of novel data formats, particularly multispectral (MS) LiDAR, remains limited to this day, despite evidence that MS reflectance can improve the accuracy of ITS. This study introduces FGI-EMIT, the first large-scale MS airborne laser scanning benchmark dataset for ITS. Captured at wavelengths 532, 905, and 1,550 nm, the dataset consists of 1,561 manually annotated trees, with a particular focus on small understory trees. Using FGI-EMIT, we comprehensively benchmarked four conventional unsupervised algorithms and four supervised DL approaches. Hyperparameters of unsupervised methods were optimized using a Bayesian approach, while DL models were trained from scratch. Among the unsupervised methods, Treeiso achieved the highest test set F1-score of 52.7%. The DL approaches performed significantly better overall, with the best model, ForestFormer3D, attaining an F1-score of 73.3%. The most significant difference was observed in understory trees, where ForestFormer3D exceeded Treeiso by 25.9 percentage points. An ablation study demonstrated that current DL-based approaches generally fail to leverage MS reflectance information when it is provided as additional input features, although single channel reflectance can improve accuracy marginally, especially for understory trees. A performance analysis across point densities further showed that DL methods consistently remain superior to unsupervised algorithms, even at densities as low as 10 points/m$^2$.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。