arXiv:2511.05927cs.CYcs.AI2025-11被引 5

研究海湾六国AI workforce准备度,发现制度与技术需同步发展。

Artificial intelligence and the Gulf Cooperation Council workforce adapting to the future of work

  • 用社会技术系统理论分析六国AI战略与实践
  • 72%的AI项目具备社会技术协同设计特征
  • 建议建立人才双轨制衔接机制防分化

本研究基于社会技术系统(STS)理论,采用混合方法评估沙特阿拉伯、阿联酋、卡塔尔、科威特、巴林和阿曼六国人工智能劳动力准备度。通过分析六国国家人工智能战略(NASs)的词频-逆文档频率(TF-IDF),梳理2017年1月至2025年4月期间公开的47项AI计划,结合穆罕默德·本·扎耶德人工智能大学(MBZUAI)与沙特数据与人工智能管理局(SDAIA)学院的案例研究,构建油收入弹性(技术能力)与监管一致性(社会协调)的场景矩阵。结果显示,47项举措中有34项(占比72%,95%置信区间0.58–0.83)体现社会技术协同设计;各国指数介于0.57至0.90之间(样本量小,区间重叠)。情景分析表明,在模型条件下,监管协调对结果的影响可能超过财政能力:碎片化规则可抵消高石油收入优势,而统一标准有助于在紧缩环境下维持进展。研究还识别出新兴的双轨人才体系——研究精英与快速培训从业者——若缺乏衔接机制,将加剧劳动力市场分化。该研究拓展了油富国、国家主导型经济体的STS应用,提出聚焦纵向耦合指标、协调行为民族志及结果导向绩效评估的研究议程。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

The rapid expansion of artificial intelligence (AI) in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) raises a central question: are investments in compute infrastructure matched by an equally robust build-out of skills, incentives, and governance? Grounded in socio-technical systems (STS) theory, this mixed-methods study audits workforce preparedness across Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA), the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Qatar, Kuwait, Bahrain, and Oman. We combine term frequency--inverse document frequency (TF--IDF) analysis of six national AI strategies (NASs), an inventory of 47 publicly disclosed AI initiatives (January 2017--April 2025), paired case studies, the Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence (MBZUAI) and the Saudi Data & Artificial Intelligence Authority (SDAIA) Academy, and a scenario matrix linking oil-revenue slack (technical capacity) to regulatory coherence (social alignment). Across the corpus, 34/47 initiatives (0.72; 95% Wilson CI 0.58--0.83) exhibit joint social--technical design; country-level indices span 0.57--0.90 (small n; intervals overlap). Scenario results suggest that, under our modeled conditions, regulatory convergence plausibly binds outcomes more than fiscal capacity: fragmented rules can offset high oil revenues, while harmonized standards help preserve progress under austerity. We also identify an emerging two-track talent system, research elites versus rapidly trained practitioners, that risks labor-market bifurcation without bridging mechanisms. By extending STS inquiry to oil-rich, state-led economies, the study refines theory and sets a research agenda focused on longitudinal coupling metrics, ethnographies of coordination, and outcome-based performance indicators.

AI治理劳动力转型政策分析中东科技

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。