arXiv:2511.11484cs.ROcs.CY2025-11

对比自驾车认证主流方法,明确各阶段适用技术。

A Comparative Evaluation of Prominent Methods in Autonomous Vehicle Certification

  • 构建自驾车认证流程框架,划分关键阶段与参与方。
  • 评估多种认证方法在不同场景下的适用性与有效性。
  • 为政策制定者提供技术选型参考,适合交通监管研究者。

瑞典议会于1997年提出“零伤亡”(Vision Zero)政策,旨在消除交通事故导致的死亡与重伤。实现该目标需依赖自动驾驶车辆上路,并制定相应的认证路线图。然而,当前尚不明确自动驾驶车辆需满足的基本安全要求如何验证与认证,以及采用何种方法。本文聚焦于自动驾驶车辆认证中主流方法的对比评估,分析现有认证方法,构建自动驾驶车辆认证流程的实施管道,明确各阶段、参与者及方法适用领域,为政策制定与技术选型提供依据。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

The "Vision Zero" policy, introduced by the Swedish Parliament in 1997, aims to eliminate fatalities and serious injuries resulting from traffic accidents. To achieve this goal, the use of self-driving vehicles in traffic is envisioned and a roadmap for the certification of self-driving vehicles is aimed to be determined. However, it is still unclear how the basic safety requirements that autonomous vehicles must meet will be verified and certified, and which methods will be used. This paper focuses on the comparative evaluation of the prominent methods planned to be used in the certification process of autonomous vehicles. It examines the prominent methods used in the certification process, develops a pipeline for the certification process of autonomous vehicles, and determines the stages, actors, and areas where the addressed methods can be applied.

自动驾驶认证评估政策研究

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。