用合成图像补足真实数据不足,提升极地麝牛检测准确率。
Lacking Data? No worries! How synthetic images can alleviate image scarcity in wildlife surveys: a case study with muskox (Ovibos moschatus)
- 用合成图像补充真实数据,训练少样本下的目标检测模型。
- 零样本模型加入合成图像后,精度、召回率和F1分数均提升,超100%后效果饱和。
- 适合缺乏真实标注数据的稀有物种监测,可作为初始建模方案。
准确的种群估算是野生动物管理的关键,能提供物种丰度与分布的重要信息。传统调查方法如目视空中计数和GNSS追踪虽广泛应用,但资源消耗大且受后勤限制。遥感、人工智能与高分辨率航拍影像的发展为野生动物检测提供了新途径。然而,深度学习目标检测模型(ODMs)常因数据量小而性能受限,尤其对分布稀疏的麝牛等物种难以训练出鲁棒模型。本研究探讨将合成图像(SI)用于补充有限训练数据,以提升在零样本(ZS)与少样本(FS)场景下的麝牛检测能力。对比了仅使用真实图像的基线模型,以及5个逐步增加SI占比的ZS与FS模型。在无真实图像的ZS设置中,引入SI显著提升了检测性能;随着合成图像增多,精确率、召回率与F1分数持续上升,但在超过基准数据集100%时趋于饱和,表明存在边际收益递减。在FS设置中,结合真实与合成图像的模型在召回率上优于纯真实数据模型,整体准确率略高,但差异不显著。结果表明,合成图像可有效支持数据稀缺情况下的精准检测,为稀有或难获取物种的监测提供可能,并支持在真实数据积累过程中持续优化模型。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Accurate population estimates are essential for wildlife management, providing critical insights into species abundance and distribution. Traditional survey methods, including visual aerial counts and GNSS telemetry tracking, are widely used to monitor muskox populations in Arctic regions. These approaches are resource intensive and constrained by logistical challenges. Advances in remote sensing, artificial intelligence, and high resolution aerial imagery offer promising alternatives for wildlife detection. Yet, the effectiveness of deep learning object detection models (ODMs) is often limited by small datasets, making it challenging to train robust ODMs for sparsely distributed species like muskoxen. This study investigates the integration of synthetic imagery (SI) to supplement limited training data and improve muskox detection in zero shot (ZS) and few-shot (FS) settings. We compared a baseline model trained on real imagery with 5 ZS and 5 FS models that incorporated progressively more SI in the training set. For the ZS models, where no real images were included in the training set, adding SI improved detection performance. As more SI were added, performance in precision, recall and F1 score increased, but eventually plateaued, suggesting diminishing returns when SI exceeded 100% of the baseline model training dataset. For FS models, combining real and SI led to better recall and slightly higher overall accuracy compared to using real images alone, though these improvements were not statistically significant. Our findings demonstrate the potential of SI to train accurate ODMs when data is scarce, offering important perspectives for wildlife monitoring by enabling rare or inaccessible species to be monitored and to increase monitoring frequency. This approach could be used to initiate ODMs without real data and refine it as real images are acquired over time.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。