arXiv:2511.20088cs.CVcs.AI2025-11

用可解释的概念模型让异常检测既准又说得清

Explainable Visual Anomaly Detection via Concept Bottleneck Models

  • 引入概念瓶颈模型,用语义概念解释异常
  • 在三个基准上性能接近传统方法,解释更清晰
  • 适合需要可信解释的工业质检等场景

近年来,视觉异常检测(VAD)因其仅需正常图像训练即可识别缺陷而受到关注。尽管许多无监督VAD模型能通过突出异常区域提供视觉解释,但这些解释缺乏对用户有意义的语义层面解读。为此,本文首次将概念瓶颈模型(CBM)拓展至VAD场景,通过学习有意义的概念,使网络能够提供人类可理解的异常描述。主要贡献包括:(i) 提出首个基于概念的异常解释框架;(ii) 在从全监督到仅合成异常等多种标注条件下评估性能与标注成本的权衡;(iii) 设计双分支结构,结合概念分支实现语义解释、视觉分支实现像素级定位,融合语义与空间可解释性。在三个主流VAD基准上,所提方法CONVAD性能媲美经典方法,同时提供更丰富的概念驱动解释,提升系统可解释性与可信度。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

In recent years, Visual Anomaly Detection (VAD) has gained significant attention due to its ability to identify defects using only normal images during training. Many VAD models work without supervision but are still able to provide visual explanations by highlighting the anomalous regions within an image. However, although these visual explanations can be helpful, they lack a direct and semantically meaningful interpretation for users. To address this limitation, we propose extending Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) to the VAD setting. By learning meaningful concepts, the network can provide human-interpretable descriptions of anomalies, offering a novel and more insightful way to explain them. Our main contributions are threefold: (i) we introduce a concept-based framework for anomaly explanation by extending CBMs to the VAD setting for the first time; (ii) we evaluate multiple supervision regimes, ranging from fully-supervised to synthetic-only anomaly settings, analyzing the trade-off between performance and labeling effort; (iii) we propose a dual-branch architecture that combines a CBM branch for concept-level explanations with a visual branch for pixel-level anomaly localization, bridging semantic and spatial interpretability. When evaluated across three well-established VAD benchmarks, our approach, Concept-Aware Visual Anomaly Detection (CONVAD), achieves performance comparable to classic VAD methods, while providing richer, concept-driven explanations that enhance interpretability and trust in VAD systems.

异常检测可解释性概念模型

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。