arXiv:2511.20471cs.AI2025-11被引 1

让大模型像人一样发散思考,生成创新解法。

Universe of Thoughts: Enabling Creative Reasoning with Large Language Models

  • 构建三种创造性推理范式:组合、探索与转化。
  • 在药物研发等开放领域,创意解法显著优于传统方法。
  • 适合需要突破性创新的科研与战略设计场景。

基于大语言模型(LLM)的推理受到广泛关注,因其在数学与复杂逻辑任务中表现出色。自思维链(CoT)提示技术以来,众多推理方法通过将问题分解为一系列顺序步骤(或思想)来提升表现。然而,现有模型多聚焦于常规问题求解,难以实现真正意义上的创造性推理。在解决方案空间广阔且常规解次优的领域,如药物发现或商业策略制定,创造性推理对发掘创新方案至关重要。为此,本文受认知科学启发,提出一个计算框架,并定义三种核心创造型推理范式:组合、探索与转化,分别引导系统性探索思想宇宙以生成创意解。进一步,提出名为“思想宇宙”(Universe of Thoughts, UoT)的新方法集,实现上述三类过程。最后,设计三个需创造性解决的新任务及评估基准,从可行性(约束)、效用与新颖性三个独立维度衡量创造力。对比最先进推理技术及具备推理能力的商用模型,UoT 在创造性推理上表现更优。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Reasoning based on Large Language Models (LLMs) has garnered increasing attention due to outstanding performance of these models in mathematical and complex logical tasks. Beginning with the Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting technique, numerous reasoning methods have emerged that decompose problems into smaller, sequential steps (or thoughts). However, existing reasoning models focus on conventional problem-solving and do not necessarily generate creative solutions by ``creative reasoning''. In domains where the solution space is expansive and conventional solutions are suboptimal, such as drug discovery or business strategization, creative reasoning to discover innovative solutions is crucial. To address this gap, first we introduce a computational framework for creative reasoning inspired by established cognitive science principles. With this framework, we propose three core creative reasoning paradigms, namely, \textit{combinational}, \textit{exploratory}, and \textit{transformative} reasoning, where each offers specific directions for systematic exploration of the universe of thoughts to generate creative solutions. Next, to materialize this framework using LLMs, we introduce the \textit{Universe of Thoughts} (or \textit{UoT}, for short), a novel set of methods to implement the aforementioned three creative processes. Finally, we introduce three novel tasks that necessitate creative problem-solving, along with an evaluation benchmark to assess creativity from three orthogonal perspectives: feasibility as constraint, and utility and novelty as metrics. With a comparative analysis against the state-of-the-art (SOTA) reasoning techniques as well as representative commercial models with reasoning capability, we show that UoT demonstrates superior performance in creative reasoning.

大模型创造性推理思想宇宙

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。