arXiv:2511.20730cs.SEcs.AI2025-11综述被引 1

梳理工程设计中数据驱动方法的应用现状与挑战

Data-Driven Methods and AI in Engineering Design: A Systematic Literature Review Focusing on Challenges and Opportunities

  • 基于PRISMA框架系统分析114篇论文,划分四个开发阶段
  • 机器学习主导应用,深度学习呈上升趋势,验证阶段仍薄弱
  • 指出模型可解释性差、跨阶段追踪难等核心问题

数据可用性和计算智能的进步加速了数据驱动方法(DDMs)在产品开发中的应用,但其整合仍呈现碎片化。主要源于对使用何种方法及何时应用缺乏明确指引。本文通过PRISMA框架进行系统综述,采用简化版V模型将产品开发分为系统设计、系统实现、系统集成和验证四个阶段。从Scopus、Web of Science和IEEE Xplore检索2014–2024年文献共1,689条,经筛选后对114篇全文进行分析。结果表明,当前以机器学习(ML)和统计方法为主流,深度学习(DL)虽使用较少但增长明显;监督学习、聚类、回归分析和代理建模在设计、实现与集成阶段广泛应用,但在验证阶段贡献有限。关键挑战包括模型可解释性不足、跨阶段可追溯性差,以及真实场景下验证不充分。研究强调需发展可解释的混合模型,并建议后续工作将计算机科学算法与工程设计任务精准匹配。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

The increasing availability of data and advancements in computational intelligence have accelerated the adoption of data-driven methods (DDMs) in product development. However, their integration into product development remains fragmented. This fragmentation stems from uncertainty, particularly the lack of clarity on what types of DDMs to use and when to employ them across the product development lifecycle. To address this, a necessary first step is to investigate the usage of DDM in engineering design by identifying which methods are being used, at which development stages, and for what application. This paper presents a PRISMA systematic literature review. The V-model as a product development framework was adopted and simplified into four stages: system design, system implementation, system integration, and validation. A structured search across Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore (2014--2024) retrieved 1{,}689 records. After screening, 114 publications underwent full-text analysis. Findings show that machine learning (ML) and statistical methods dominate current practice, whereas deep learning (DL), though still less common, exhibits a clear upward trend in adoption. Additionally, supervised learning, clustering, regression analysis, and surrogate modeling are prevalent in design, implementation, and integration system stages but contributions to validation remain limited. Key challenges in existing applications include limited model interpretability, poor cross-stage traceability, and insufficient validation under real-world conditions. Additionally, it highlights key limitations and opportunities such as the need for interpretable hybrid models. This review is a first step toward design-stage guidelines; a follow-up synthesis should map computer science algorithms to engineering design problems and activities.

数据驱动工程设计系统综述机器学习

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。