arXiv:2511.21755cs.DLcs.AI2025-11被引 1

AI训练需尊重版权,作者应有明确拒绝权。

Who Owns the Knowledge? Copyright, GenAI, and the Future of Academic Publishing

  • 主张作者对作品被用于AI训练拥有明确否决权。
  • 现有版权法未覆盖AI训练场景,存在重大法律空白。
  • 适合关注学术出版与AI伦理的科研人员和政策制定者。

生成式人工智能(GenAI)与大语言模型(LLMs)融入科研与高等教育,带来变革机遇的同时也引发深刻的伦理、法律与监管问题。本文聚焦AI与科学的交叉领域,探讨版权法与开放科学原则面临的挑战。研究指出,美、中、欧、英等主要司法管辖区现行法规虽旨在促进创新,但在使用受版权保护的作品及开放科学成果训练AI方面存在显著漏洞。广泛采用的创作共用(Creative Commons)许可未能充分应对AI训练的特殊性,且AI系统普遍缺乏溯源机制,严重冲击原创性概念。尽管当前判例将AI训练视为潜在合理使用,但本文认为此类机制不足,版权持有者应拥有不受合理使用限制的明确退出权利。作者倡导维护作者拒绝作品用于训练的权利,并建议大学在负责任的AI治理中发挥引领作用。结论强调,亟需国际协调立法,以确保透明度、保护知识产权,并防止垄断市场结构侵蚀科学诚信与知识公平生产。本文为2025年第20届国际科学计量与信息学会议报告的大幅扩展修订版。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

The integration of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) and large language models (LLMs) into scientific research and higher education presents a paradigm shift, offering revolutionizing opportunities while simultaneously raising profound ethical, legal, and regulatory questions. This study examines the complex intersection of AI and science, with a specific focus on the challenges posed to copyright law and the principles of open science. The author argues that current regulatory frameworks in key jurisdictions like the United States, China, the European Union, and the United Kingdom, while aiming to foster innovation, contain significant gaps, particularly concerning the use of copyrighted works and open science outputs for AI training. Widely adopted licensing mechanisms, such as Creative Commons, fail to adequately address the nuances of AI training, and the pervasive lack of attribution within AI systems fundamentally challenges established notions of originality. While current doctrine treats AI training as potentially fair use, this paper argues such mechanisms are inadequate and that copyright holders should retain explicit opt-out rights regardless of fair use doctrine. Instead, the author advocates for upholding authors' rights to refuse the use of their works for AI training and proposes that universities assume a leading role in shaping responsible AI governance. The conclusion is that a harmonized international legislative effort is urgently needed to ensure transparency, protect intellectual property, and prevent the emergence of an oligopolistic market structure that could prioritize commercial profit over scientific integrity and equitable knowledge production. This is a substantially expanded and revised version of a work originally presented at the 20th International Conference on Scientometrics & Informetrics (Kochetkov, 2025).

AI伦理版权开放科学学术出版

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。