arXiv:2511.21975cs.CYcs.AI2025-11

为AI投资提供风险调整后的回报评估框架,兼顾收益与新型风险。

The Risk-Adjusted Intelligence Dividend: A Quantitative Framework for Measuring AI Return on Investment Integrating ISO 42001 and Regulatory Exposure

  • 构建融合风险变化的AI投资回报量化模型
  • 考虑模型漂移、合规失败等风险导致的潜在损失
  • 适合关注合规与财务决策的AI管理者

投入人工智能的组织面临根本性挑战:传统投资回报率计算无法反映AI实施的双重属性——既降低部分运营风险,又引入算法故障、对抗攻击和监管责任等新暴露。本文提出一种综合性金融框架,用于量化考虑组织风险特征变化的AI项目回报。该方法填补了当前实践中的空白:投资决策常依赖乐观收益预期,却未计入人工智能特有威胁的概率成本,如模型漂移、偏见引发的诉讼以及欧盟《人工智能法案》和ISO/IEC 42001等新规下的合规失败。基于年损失期望计算和蒙特卡洛模拟等成熟风险量化技术,该框架可计算包含生产效率提升与实施前后风险敞口差值的净收益。分析表明,精准评估需显式建模控制有效性、算法故障储备金及持续维护模型性能的运营成本。实际应用包括建立治理结构、分阶段验证指南,以及将风险调整指标纳入资本配置决策,最终实现满足受托责任与监管要求的证据驱动型AI组合管理。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Organizations investing in artificial intelligence face a fundamental challenge: traditional return on investment calculations fail to capture the dual nature of AI implementations, which simultaneously reduce certain operational risks while introducing novel exposures related to algorithmic malfunction, adversarial attacks, and regulatory liability. This research presents a comprehensive financial framework for quantifying AI project returns that explicitly integrates changes in organizational risk profiles. The methodology addresses a critical gap in current practice where investment decisions rely on optimistic benefit projections without accounting for the probabilistic costs of AI-specific threats including model drift, bias-related litigation, and compliance failures under emerging regulations such as the European Union Artificial Intelligence Act and ISO/IEC 42001. Drawing on established risk quantification methods, including annual loss expectancy calculations and Monte Carlo simulation techniques, this framework enables practitioners to compute net benefits that incorporate both productivity gains and the delta between pre-implementation and post-implementation risk exposures. The analysis demonstrates that accurate AI investment evaluation requires explicit modeling of control effectiveness, reserve requirements for algorithmic failures, and the ongoing operational costs of maintaining model performance. Practical implications include specific guidance for establishing governance structures, conducting phased validations, and integrating risk-adjusted metrics into capital allocation decisions, ultimately enabling evidence-based AI portfolio management that satisfies both fiduciary responsibilities and regulatory mandates.

AI投资风险管理合规评估量化框架

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。