提出七项认知缺陷,推动AI向自主决策迈进
Bridging the Gap: Toward Cognitive Autonomy in Artificial Intelligence
- 从神经认知角度分析当前AI的七大局限
- 指出现有模型无法实现真正自主与持续适应
- 适合关注AI长期演进与安全可控的研究者
人工智能在感知、语言、推理和多模态领域已取得显著进展,但现代AI系统仍严重缺乏自我监控、自我修正和动态环境中的自主行为调节能力。本文识别并分析了制约当前AI模型的七个核心缺陷:内在自我监控缺失、元认知意识不足、学习机制固定且不可自适应、目标重构能力缺失、表征维持能力不足、身体反馈信息有限以及内在代理性缺失。基于对人工系统与生物认知的比较分析[7],结合人工智能、认知科学与神经科学的洞见,本文阐明这些能力为何在现有模型中缺失,且单纯扩大规模无法解决根本问题。最后主张迈向以认知为基础的人工智能(认知自主性)范式,具备自我驱动的适应、动态表征管理及有意识的目标行为,并配备可解释、可调控、与人类价值观对齐的监督机制[8]。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Artificial intelligence has advanced rapidly across perception, language, reasoning, and multimodal domains. Yet despite these achievements, modern AI systems remain fundamentally limited in their ability to self-monitor, self-correct, and regulate their behavior autonomously in dynamic contexts. This paper identifies and analyzes seven core deficiencies that constrain contemporary AI models: the absence of intrinsic self-monitoring, lack of meta-cognitive awareness, fixed and non-adaptive learning mechanisms, inability to restructure goals, lack of representational maintenance, insufficient embodied feedback, and the absence of intrinsic agency. Alongside identifying these limitations, we also outline a forward-looking perspective on how AI may evolve beyond them through architectures that mirror neurocognitive principles. We argue that these structural limitations prevent current architectures, including deep learning and transformer-based systems, from achieving robust generalization, lifelong adaptability, and real-world autonomy. Drawing on a comparative analysis of artificial systems and biological cognition [7], and integrating insights from AI research, cognitive science, and neuroscience, we outline how these capabilities are absent in current models and why scaling alone cannot resolve them. We conclude by advocating for a paradigmatic shift toward cognitively grounded AI (cognitive autonomy) capable of self-directed adaptation, dynamic representation management, and intentional, goal-oriented behavior, paired with reformative oversight mechanisms [8] that ensure autonomous systems remain interpretable, governable, and aligned with human values.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。