arXiv:2512.04220cs.CL2025-12被引 11

发现并解决大模型工具调用训练中的概率衰减崩溃问题

On Group Relative Policy Optimization Collapse in Agent Search: The Lazy Likelihood-Displacement

  • 提出懒惰似然偏移机制,解释正确与错误响应概率同时下降
  • 实证揭示三阶段崩溃轨迹:早期停滞、持续衰退、加速崩塌
  • 设计细粒度正则化方法,仅在概率下降时干预关键令牌

工具集成强化学习(TI-RL)使大语言模型通过与搜索引擎等外部工具交互实现多步推理。群体相对策略优化(GRPO,如Search-R1)因收敛快且无需价值函数而具有吸引力,但训练中普遍存在崩溃现象。本文识别出‘懒惰似然偏移’(LLD)为根本原因——正确与错误响应的似然值系统性降低或停滞。LLD早期出现并引发自我强化的‘似然衰减死亡螺旋’:似然下降导致低置信度输出,放大梯度,最终造成训练崩溃。我们在类Search-R1的搜索问答任务上验证该过程,发现一致的三阶段轨迹:早期停滞、稳定衰退、加速崩溃。为此,我们提出仅在响应似然下降时激活的似然保持正则化方法LLDS,仅对相关令牌进行调控。该方法结构精细,干扰极小。实验表明,它能稳定训练、防止梯度爆炸,在七个基准上显著提升性能,相比原生GRPO,Qwen2.5-3B提升+45.2%,Qwen2.5-7B提升+37.1%。研究确立了LLD是GRPO-TI-RL中被忽视的关键瓶颈,并提供了一条稳定可扩展训练的实用路径。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Tool-integrated (TI) reinforcement learning (RL) enables large language models (LLMs) to perform multi-step reasoning by interacting with external tools such as search engines and retrievers. Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), exemplified by the recent Search-R1, offers fast convergence and a value-free formulation that makes it appealing for this setting, yet consistently suffers from training collapse. We identify Lazy Likelihood Displacement (LLD), a systematic reduction or stagnation in the likelihood of both correct and incorrect responses, as the core mechanism driving this failure. LLD emerges early and triggers a self-reinforcing LLD Death Spiral, where declining likelihood leads to low-confidence responses, inflating gradients, and ultimately causing collapse. We empirically characterize this process across models on a Search-R1-style, search-integrated question answering task, revealing a consistent three-phase trajectory: early stagnation, steady decay, and accelerated collapse. To address this, we propose a likelihood-preserving regularization LLDS that activates only when a response action's likelihood decreases, and regularizes only the tokens responsible. This fine-grained structure mitigates LLD with minimal interference. Our method stabilizes training, prevents gradient explosion, and yields substantial performance improvements across seven benchmarks, including relative improvements of +45.2% on Qwen2.5-3B and +37.1% on Qwen2.5-7B over vanilla GRPO training. Our results establish LLD as a previously overlooked bottleneck in GRPO-based TIRL and provide a practical path toward stable, scalable training of tool-integrated RL.

强化学习大模型工具调用训练稳定

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。