用神经网络自动发现认知错误的神经机制。
Setting up for failure: automatic discovery of the neural mechanisms of cognitive errors
- 训练RNN复现人类/动物在任务中的完整行为模式,包括错误和低效表现。
- 通过非参数生成模型和扩散模型扩充数据,提升训练效果。
- 揭示了视觉工作记忆中交换错误的潜在神经机制,可实验验证。
揭示认知的神经机制是神经科学的重大挑战之一。以往构建解释行为的循环神经网络(RNN)动态模型的方法需人工反复调整架构或优化目标,过程零散且依赖经验。本文提出一种新方法:通过显式训练RNN复现人类和动物在认知任务中产生的行为,包括典型错误和次优表现,实现机制的自动发现。为此,我们提出两项创新:首先,由于实验数据量有限,采用非参数生成模型生成替代数据用于训练;其次,开发基于扩散模型的新训练方法,以捕捉数据的所有统计特征。以视觉工作记忆任务为测试平台,该任务已知会产生因交换错误导致的明显多模态响应分布。结果表明,所获网络动态能正确刻画猕猴神经数据的定性特征。这些成果无法通过传统方法获得——例如仅拟合有限的行为特征或训练网络追求任务最优。本方法还对交换错误的机制提出新颖预测,可直接用于实验验证。结果表明,拟合丰富行为模式的RNN是自动发现重要认知功能机制的强大工具。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Discovering the neural mechanisms underpinning cognition is one of the grand challenges of neuroscience. However, previous approaches for building models of RNN dynamics that explain behaviour required iterative refinement of architectures and/or optimisation objectives, resulting in a piecemeal, and mostly heuristic, human-in-the-loop process. Here, we offer an alternative approach that automates the discovery of viable RNN mechanisms by explicitly training RNNs to reproduce behaviour, including the same characteristic errors and suboptimalities, that humans and animals produce in a cognitive task. Achieving this required two main innovations. First, as the amount of behavioural data that can be collected in experiments is often too limited to train RNNs, we use a non-parametric generative model of behavioural responses to produce surrogate data for training RNNs. Second, to capture all relevant statistical aspects of the data, we developed a novel diffusion model-based approach for training RNNs. To showcase the potential of our approach, we chose a visual working memory task as our test-bed, as behaviour in this task is well known to produce response distributions that are patently multimodal (due to swap errors). The resulting network dynamics correctly qualitative features of macaque neural data. Importantly, these results were not possible to obtain with more traditional approaches, i.e., when only a limited set of behavioural signatures (rather than the full richness of behavioural response distributions) were fitted, or when RNNs were trained for task optimality (instead of reproducing behaviour). Our approach also yields novel predictions about the mechanism of swap errors, which can be readily tested in experiments. These results suggest that fitting RNNs to rich patterns of behaviour provides a powerful way to automatically discover mechanisms of important cognitive functions.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。