arXiv:2512.06221cs.CV2025-12被引 1

复现发现SVD+WDR压缩效果不如JPEG2000,质疑原论文结论。

Revisiting SVD and Wavelet Difference Reduction for Lossy Image Compression: A Reproducibility Study

  • 独立复现原方法,重点修复缺失实现细节。
  • 在PSNR上未超越JPEG2000,SSIM仅部分提升。
  • 揭示原论文量化与阈值设定不清导致结果不可靠。

本研究对一种结合奇异值分解(SVD)与小波差分减少(WDR)的有损图像压缩技术进行了独立复现。原论文声称该方法在视觉质量与压缩比上优于JPEG2000和单独使用WDR。本文重新实现该方法,仔细排查缺失的实现细节,并尽可能复现原始实验。随后在新图像上开展额外实验,采用PSNR与SSIM进行评估。结果表明,该方法在PSNR上普遍不及JPEG2000,仅在部分情况下对SSIM有轻微提升。研究揭示了原论文描述中存在的模糊之处(如量化策略与阈值初始化),说明这些缺陷可能显著影响可复现性与报告性能。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

This work presents an independent reproducibility study of a lossy image compression technique that integrates singular value decomposition (SVD) and wavelet difference reduction (WDR). The original paper claims that combining SVD and WDR yields better visual quality and higher compression ratios than JPEG2000 and standalone WDR. I re-implemented the proposed method, carefully examined missing implementation details, and replicated the original experiments as closely as possible. I then conducted additional experiments on new images and evaluated performance using PSNR and SSIM. In contrast to the original claims, my results indicate that the SVD+WDR technique generally does not surpass JPEG2000 or WDR in terms of PSNR, and only partially improves SSIM relative to JPEG2000. The study highlights ambiguities in the original description (e.g., quantization and threshold initialization) and illustrates how such gaps can significantly impact reproducibility and reported performance.

图像压缩复现研究SVDWDR

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。