arXiv:2512.09190cs.HCcs.AI2025-12

首次用脑电图对比主动与自动驾驶时的驾驶心理状态差异。

Understanding Mental States in Active and Autonomous Driving with EEG

  • 通过31名参与者在三种复杂度任务中采集脑电数据,比较两种驾驶模式下的心理状态变化。
  • 自动驾驶虽整体脑区激活较低,但仍存在认知负荷、疲劳等显著波动。
  • 主动与自动驾驶的心理状态分布差异大,模型难以互相迁移,需场景专用数据。

理解主动驾驶与自动驾驶中驾驶员心理状态的差异,对设计安全的人车交互界面至关重要。本文首次基于脑电图(EEG)对比了两种驾驶模式下认知负荷、疲劳、情绪效价和唤醒度的差异。利用31名参与者在三种不同复杂度任务中执行相同操作的数据,分析了时间模式、任务复杂度影响及通道层面的激活差异。结果表明,尽管两种模式在复杂度趋势上相似,但心理状态强度及神经激活模式存在显著差异,说明主动与自动驾驶间存在明显的分布偏移。迁移学习实验验证了以主动驾驶数据训练的模型在自动驾驶场景中泛化性能差,反之亦然。我们将其归因于两种驾驶模式在运动参与度与注意力需求上的差异,导致不同的空间与时间脑电激活模式。虽然自动驾驶总体皮层激活较低,但参与者仍表现出与干预准备、任务诱发情绪反应及单调性相关的被动疲劳等可测量的心理状态波动。这些发现强调,在开发下一代自动驾驶车辆驾驶员监控系统时,必须采用场景专用的数据与模型。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Understanding how driver mental states differ between active and autonomous driving is critical for designing safe human-vehicle interfaces. This paper presents the first EEG-based comparison of cognitive load, fatigue, valence, and arousal across the two driving modes. Using data from 31 participants performing identical tasks in both scenarios of three different complexity levels, we analyze temporal patterns, task-complexity effects, and channel-wise activation differences. Our findings show that although both modes evoke similar trends across complexity levels, the intensity of mental states and the underlying neural activation differ substantially, indicating a clear distribution shift between active and autonomous driving. Transfer-learning experiments confirm that models trained on active driving data generalize poorly to autonomous driving and vice versa. We attribute this distribution shift primarily to differences in motor engagement and attentional demands between the two driving modes, which lead to distinct spatial and temporal EEG activation patterns. Although autonomous driving results in lower overall cortical activation, participants continue to exhibit measurable fluctuations in cognitive load, fatigue, valence, and arousal associated with readiness to intervene, task-evoked emotional responses, and monotony-related passive fatigue. These results emphasize the need for scenario-specific data and models when developing next-generation driver monitoring systems for autonomous vehicles.

脑电图驾驶监控自动驾驶心理状态

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。