让大模型反向思考，更准发现推理中缺失的信息。
Reverse Thinking Enhances Missing Information Detection in Large Language Models
- 用反向推理引导模型回溯必要条件，定位遗漏信息
- 实验显示准确率显著优于传统正向推理方法
- 适合提升大模型在逻辑推理中的完整性与可靠性
大型语言模型在各类推理任务中表现卓越，但在涉及缺失信息的问题上常出现回答不完整、事实错误和幻觉等问题。尽管正向推理方法如思维链（Chain-of-Thought, CoT）和思维树（Tree-of-Thought, ToT）在结构化问题求解中取得成功，却难以系统识别并恢复遗漏信息。本文探索反向思考方法在提升大模型缺失信息检测能力方面的潜力。受逆向推理研究启发，提出一种新框架，引导大模型通过反向思考识别必要条件并定位缺失要素。该方法将复杂的缺失信息识别任务转化为更易处理的逆向推理问题，显著提升模型准确性。实验结果表明，相比传统正向推理方法，本方法性能有显著提升，为增强大模型逻辑完整性与推理鲁棒性提供了新方向。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in various reasoning tasks, yet they often struggle with problems involving missing information, exhibiting issues such as incomplete responses, factual errors, and hallucinations. While forward reasoning approaches like Chain-of-Thought (CoT) and Tree-of-Thought (ToT) have shown success in structured problem-solving, they frequently fail to systematically identify and recover omitted information. In this paper, we explore the potential of reverse thinking methodologies to enhance LLMs' performance on missing information detection tasks. Drawing inspiration from recent work on backward reasoning, we propose a novel framework that guides LLMs through reverse thinking to identify necessary conditions and pinpoint missing elements. Our approach transforms the challenging task of missing information identification into a more manageable backward reasoning problem, significantly improving model accuracy. Experimental results demonstrate that our reverse thinking approach achieves substantial performance gains compared to traditional forward reasoning methods, providing a promising direction for enhancing LLMs' logical completeness and reasoning robustness.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品；中文卡片由大模型生成，请以原文为准。