用语义还原技术识别并恢复学术论文中被伪装的抄袭内容。
Semantic Reconstruction of Adversarial Plagiarism: A Context-Aware Framework for Detecting and Restoring "Tortured Phrases" in Scientific Literature
- 通过领域专用模型检测语法合理但语义异常的伪装句。
- 利用向量检索与句级对齐,实现23.67%的原文术语恢复率。
- 适合学术打假、论文审查及防伪工具开发者使用。
科学文献的完整性正受到对抗性文本生成技术的严重威胁,尤其是自动化改写工具对抄袭内容的伪装。这类工具生成“扭曲短语”(如用“伪造意识”替代“人工智能”),在保持局部语法正确的同时隐藏原出处。现有检测方法依赖静态词表或通用语言模型,对新型伪装方式误检率高,且无法追溯来源。本文提出语义重构对抗抄袭框架(SRAP),包含两阶段:(1)基于领域模型SciBERT的词级伪困惑度统计异常检测;(2)通过密集向量检索(FAISS)与句级对齐(SBERT)实现源文档重建。在对抗性科学文本平行语料上的实验表明,零样本基线恢复准确率为0.00%,而本方法达到23.67%,显著优于基线。同时发现,在术语密集的科学文本中,静态阈值比动态阈值更具鲁棒性。SRAP可实现溯源分析,将伪装表达关联到最可能的原始文献。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
The integrity and reliability of scientific literature is facing a serious threat by adversarial text generation techniques, specifically from the use of automated paraphrasing tools to mask plagiarism. These tools generate "tortured phrases", statistically improbable synonyms (e.g. "counterfeit consciousness" for "artificial intelligence"), that preserve the local grammar while obscuring the original source. Most existing detection methods depend heavily on static blocklists or general-domain language models, which suffer from high false-negative rates for novel obfuscations and cannot determine the source of the plagiarized content. In this paper, we propose Semantic Reconstruction of Adversarial Plagiarism (SRAP), a framework designed not only to detect these anomalies but to mathematically recover the original terminology. We use a two-stage architecture: (1) statistical anomaly detection with a domain-specific masked language model (SciBERT) using token-level pseudo-perplexity, and (2) source-based semantic reconstruction using dense vector retrieval (FAISS) and sentence-level alignment (SBERT). Experiments on a parallel corpus of adversarial scientific text show that while zero-shot baselines fail completely (0.00 percent restoration accuracy), our retrieval-augmented approach achieves 23.67 percent restoration accuracy, significantly outperforming baseline methods. We also show that static decision boundaries are necessary for robust detection in jargon-heavy scientific text, since dynamic thresholding fails under high variance. SRAP enables forensic analysis by linking obfuscated expressions back to their most probable source documents.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。