arXiv:2512.13739cs.CVcs.AI2025-12被引 1

提出人机协作机制,让AI生成新闻图像更可控、可信、合规。

Human-AI Collaboration Mechanism Study on AIGC Assisted Image Production for Special Coverage

  • 构建人机协同流程:分割+语义对齐+风格调节,全程可追踪。
  • 实验验证跨平台差异,发现训练数据偏差影响图像真实感与文化表达。
  • 提出三项评估指标,适合媒体机构规范AI图像生产使用。

人工智能生成内容(AIGC)在新闻特殊报道中引发争议,涉及虚假信息、真实性、语义一致性和可解释性问题。多数AIGC工具为“黑箱”,难以兼顾内容准确与语义对齐,带来伦理与信任挑战。本文探索新闻特殊报道中可控图像生成路径,基于中国某媒体机构项目开展两项实验:(1) 实验一通过三类场景的标准提示测试跨平台适应性,揭示因训练语料偏差与平台过滤导致的语义一致性、文化特异性与视觉真实性的差异;(2) 实验二构建人机协同模块化流程,融合高精度分割(SAM、GroundingDINO)、语义对齐(BrushNet)与风格调控(Style-LoRA、Prompt-to-Prompt),并通过CLIP语义评分、NSFW/OCR/YOLO过滤及可验证内容凭证保障编辑一致性。全流程可追溯,保留语义表征。据此提出适用于特殊报道的AIGC人机协作机制,并推荐评估角色身份稳定性(CIS)、文化表达准确性(CEA)与用户-公众适宜性(U-PA)。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Artificial Intelligence Generated Content (AIGC) assisting image production triggers controversy in journalism while attracting attention from media agencies. Key issues involve misinformation, authenticity, semantic fidelity, and interpretability. Most AIGC tools are opaque "black boxes," hindering the dual demands of content accuracy and semantic alignment and creating ethical, sociotechnical, and trust dilemmas. This paper explores pathways for controllable image production in journalism's special coverage and conducts two experiments with projects from China's media agency: (1) Experiment 1 tests cross-platform adaptability via standardized prompts across three scenes, revealing disparities in semantic alignment, cultural specificity, and visual realism driven by training-corpus bias and platform-level filtering. (2) Experiment 2 builds a human-in-the-loop modular pipeline combining high-precision segmentation (SAM, GroundingDINO), semantic alignment (BrushNet), and style regulating (Style-LoRA, Prompt-to-Prompt), ensuring editorial fidelity through CLIP-based semantic scoring, NSFW/OCR/YOLO filtering, and verifiable content credentials. Traceable deployment preserves semantic representation. Consequently, we propose a human-AI collaboration mechanism for AIGC assisted image production in special coverage and recommend evaluating Character Identity Stability (CIS), Cultural Expression Accuracy (CEA), and User-Public Appropriateness (U-PA).

AIGC人机协作新闻图像可控生成

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。