arXiv:2512.14031cs.ROcs.AI2025-12

对比视觉语言动作模型与强化学习在建筑机器人技能学习中的效率与效果。

Sample-Efficient Robot Skill Learning for Construction Tasks: Benchmarking Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning and Vision-Language-Action VLA Model

  • 采用双遥操作界面收集示范数据,支持长时序精细任务训练。
  • VLA模型在少样本下达60%~100%成功率,显著优于需调参的DQN。
  • 适合追求低编程成本、快速部署的建筑自动化场景。

本研究评估了两种前沿方法在建筑机器人新技能学习中的适用性:视觉-语言-动作(VLA)模型与强化学习(RL)方法。目标是衡量任务表现及实际部署所需工作量。作者开发了两种遥操作接口,成功采集了用于训练长时序、高精度任务的示范数据。研究分三阶段进行:首先比较多层感知机(MLP)策略与深度Q网络(DQN)模仿学习模型,确定更强的RL基线;其次在两种场景下训练并对比三种VLA模型;最后以计算效率和样本效率为指标,将选定的RL基线与VLA模型进行基准测试,并在包含搬运与安装的多阶段面板安装任务上开展机器人实验。结果显示,VLA模型具备强泛化能力与少样本学习优势,在抓取阶段分别达到60%和100%成功率;而DQN虽可增强鲁棒性,但需额外添加噪声调参,增加工作量。总体表明,VLA在任务变更时具有明显实践优势,可大幅降低编程成本并用极少数据实现有效性能,而DQN在允许充分调优的前提下仍具可行性。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

This study evaluates two leading approaches for teaching construction robots new skills to understand their applicability for construction automation: a Vision-Language-Action (VLA) model and Reinforcement Learning (RL) methods. The goal is to understand both task performance and the practical effort needed to deploy each approach on real jobs. The authors developed two teleoperation interfaces to control the robots and collect the demonstrations needed, both of which proved effective for training robots for long-horizon and dexterous tasks. In addition, the authors conduct a three-stage evaluation. First, the authors compare a Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) policy with a Deep Q-network (DQN) imitation model to identify the stronger RL baseline, focusing on model performance, generalization, and a pick-up experiment. Second, three different VLA models are trained in two different scenarios and compared with each other. Third, the authors benchmark the selected RL baseline against the VLA model using computational and sample-efficiency measures and then a robot experiment on a multi-stage panel installation task that includes transport and installation. The VLA model demonstrates strong generalization and few-shot capability, achieving 60% and 100% success in the pickup phase. In comparison, DQN can be made robust but needs additional noise during tuning, which increases the workload. Overall, the findings indicate that VLA offers practical advantages for changing tasks by reducing programming effort and enabling useful performance with minimal data, while DQN provides a viable baseline when sufficient tuning effort is acceptable.

机器人技能少样本学习建筑自动化VLA模型

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。