arXiv:2512.16036cs.AI2025-12

自动识别高校AI政策主题与允许程度,帮学生看清使用边界。

Topic Discovery and Classification for Responsible Generative AI Adaptation in Higher Education

  • 用无监督建模+大模型分类,从课纲和官网提取政策主题。
  • 话题发现一致性达0.73,分类准确率92%~97%,召回率85%~97%。
  • 适合教育机构部署,助力学生合规使用生成式AI。

随着生成式人工智能(GenAI)在个性化学习和实时反馈方面能力增强,越来越多学生将其融入学术流程,用于概念理解、难题求解,甚至直接复制生成内容完成作业。尽管GenAI有提升学习体验的潜力,但也引发信息误导、幻觉输出及削弱批判性思维的风险。为此,众多高校和教师开始制定相关政策引导其合理使用,但政策差异大、更新频繁,学生常难以把握规范。本文设计并实现了一套自动化系统,从课程大纲和机构政策网站中发现并分类与GenAI相关的条款。系统结合无监督主题建模识别核心政策主题,利用大语言模型(LLM)对允许程度与其他要求进行分类。该应用在主题发现上达到0.73的相干性得分;基于GPT-4.0的分类在八个主题上精度为0.92~0.97,召回率为0.85~0.97。通过结构化呈现政策信息,该工具促进生成式AI在教育中的安全、公平与教学目标一致的应用。此外,系统可嵌入教育平台,辅助学生理解并遵守相关规范。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

As generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) becomes increasingly capable of delivering personalized learning experiences and real-time feedback, a growing number of students are incorporating these tools into their academic workflows. They use GenAI to clarify concepts, solve complex problems, and, in some cases, complete assignments by copying and pasting model-generated contents. While GenAI has the potential to enhance learning experience, it also raises concerns around misinformation, hallucinated outputs, and its potential to undermine critical thinking and problem-solving skills. In response, many universities, colleges, departments, and instructors have begun to develop and adopt policies to guide responsible integration of GenAI into learning environments. However, these policies vary widely across institutions and contexts, and their evolving nature often leaves students uncertain about expectations and best practices. To address this challenge, the authors designed and implemented an automated system for discovering and categorizing AI-related policies found in course syllabi and institutional policy websites. The system combines unsupervised topic modeling techniques to identify key policy themes with large language models (LLMs) to classify the level of GenAI allowance and other requirements in policy texts. The developed application achieved a coherence score of 0.73 for topic discovery. In addition, GPT-4.0-based classification of policy categories achieved precision between 0.92 and 0.97, and recall between 0.85 and 0.97 across eight identified topics. By providing structured and interpretable policy information, this tool promotes the safe, equitable, and pedagogically aligned use of GenAI technologies in education. Furthermore, the system can be integrated into educational technology platforms to help students understand and comply with relevant guidelines.

生成式AI教育政策文本分类大模型应用

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。