提出教育中人机共舞框架,重申师生在AI时代的主体地位
Cyber Humanism in Education: Reclaiming Agency through AI and Learning Sciences
- 将人机学习环境视为共建的社技术基础设施
- 通过提示学习和对话式教师认证提升认知自主性
- 适合关注AI教育伦理与教师角色重塑的研究者
生成式人工智能正快速重塑教育中的知识生产与验证方式。大型语言模型并未简单作为数字工具存在,而是将阅读、写作和编程重构为混合人机工作流,引发认知卸载、知识权威弱化及教师职业化退化的担忧。本文提出「教育中的赛博人文主义」框架,以重拾人类主体性。我们将AI赋能的学习环境视为由人与机器共同创作的社会技术基础设施,将教育者与学习者定位为具有权利与责任的「算法公民」。提出三个设计支柱:反思性能力、算法公民权与对话式设计,并关联国际主流数字与AI能力框架。通过高等教育案例,展示基于提示的学习与EPICT生态中的对话式人工智能教师认证如何实践该理念。研究发现此类实践可强化认知自主性,但亦暴露工作量、公平性与治理的张力,为未来以人为本的高AI渗透教育提供启示。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is rapidly reshaping how knowledge is produced and validated in education. Rather than adding another digital tool, large language models reconfigure reading, writing, and coding into hybrid human-AI workflows, raising concerns about epistemic automation, cognitive offloading, and the de-professiona\-lisation of teachers. This paper proposes \emph{Cyber Humanism in Education} as a framework for reclaiming human agency in this landscape. We conceptualise AI-enabled learning environments as socio-technical infrastructures co-authored by humans and machines, and position educators and learners as epistemic agents and \emph{algorithmic citizens} who have both the right and the responsibility to shape these infrastructures. We articulate three pillars for cyber-humanist design, \emph{reflexive competence}, \emph{algorithmic citizenship}, and \emph{dialogic design}, and relate them to major international digital and AI competence frameworks. We then present higher-education case studies that operationalise these ideas through \emph{prompt-based learning} and a new \emph{Conversational AI Educator} certification within the EPICT ecosystem. The findings show how such practices can strengthen epistemic agency while surfacing tensions around workload, equity, and governance, and outline implications for the future of AI-rich, human-centred education.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。