在预算限制下分阶段升级边缘服务器,提升任务延迟满足率
Delay-Aware Multi-Stage Edge Server Upgrade with Budget Constraint
- 分阶段决策新增或升级现有服务器,优化任务卸载策略
- 小规模网络中近似解误差小于1.25%,大规模下任务满足率提升21.57%
- 适合长期规划边缘计算系统,尤其关注成本与延迟的场景
本文提出多阶段边缘服务器升级(M-ESU)问题,针对多接入边缘计算(MEC)系统在多年内分阶段升级的网络规划需求。核心决策包括:是否部署新服务器或升级现有服务器,以及如何优化任务卸载以最大化满足延迟要求的任务平均数量。框架结合新服务器部署与现有服务器容量升级,并考虑每阶段预算、部署与升级成本及折旧率、服务器计算资源、任务数量及其年增长率(%)、任务数据量增长及更严格延迟要求等约束。提出两种求解方法:混合整数线性规划(MILP)用于小规模网络获取最优解,高效启发式算法(M-ESU/H)用于大规模网络。仿真显示,小规模下M-ESU/H解距最优解仅差1.25%,但求解速度提升数个数量级;大规模下相较仅部署、优先部署或优先升级的三种替代方案,M-ESU/H在相同预算与需求增长条件下,任务满足率最高提升21.57%,验证其可扩展性与实际价值。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
In this paper, the Multi-stage Edge Server Upgrade (M-ESU) is proposed as a new network planning problem, involving the upgrading of an existing multi-access edge computing (MEC) system through multiple stages (e.g., over several years). More precisely, the problem considers two key decisions: (i) whether to deploy additional edge servers or upgrade those already installed, and (ii) how tasks should be offloaded so that the average number of tasks that meet their delay requirement is maximized. The framework specifically involves: (i) deployment of new servers combined with capacity upgrades for existing servers, and (ii) the optimal task offloading to maximize the average number of tasks with a delay requirement. It also considers the following constraints: (i) budget per stage, (ii) server deployment and upgrade cost (in $) and cost depreciation rate, (iii) computation resource of servers, (iv) number of tasks and their growth rate (in %), and (v) the increase in task sizes and stricter delay requirements over time. We present two solutions: a Mixed Integer Linear Programming (MILP) model and an efficient heuristic algorithm (M-ESU/H). MILP yields the optimal solution for small networks, whereas M-ESU/H is used in large-scale networks. For small networks, the simulation results show that the solution computed by M-ESU/H is within 1.25% of the optimal solution while running several orders of magnitude faster. For large networks, M-ESU/H is compared against three alternative heuristic solutions that consider only server deployment, or giving priority to server deployment or upgrade. Our experiments show that M-ESU/H yields up to 21.57% improvement in task satisfaction under identical budget and demand growth conditions, confirming its scalability and practical value for long-term MEC systems.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。